Solar Timeline

Credits and sources

The app

The app at solartimeline.org: the Film; the Library, the film beside its 3D sets and the spacecraft and stations part by part; and the Explorer, the solar system on any date, with real missions replayed and today's craft live. It uses all of the film's sources (below, under The film) and these of its own.

Moons

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Moons in the viewer's system viewsNASA JPL satellite ephemerides via NASA NAIF (naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/generic_kernels/spk/satellites/): mar099s (Phobos, Deimos), jup365 (Galilean moons, Amalthea), sat441 (Saturn's moons), nep097 (Triton), nep098_part-3 (Proteus, 1800-2199), ura184_part-3 (Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, Oberon, 1600-2399), plu060 (Charon and Pluto's small moons); and every other moon these kernels carry (Thebe, Helene, Telesto, Calypso, Methone, Polydeuces, Larissa, Hippocamp, and Uranus's nine irregular moons from ura184_part-3), R. A. Jacobson, M. Brozović and colleagues; GMs from NAIF's gm_de440.tpc; read with SpiceyPyNASA, public
Every known moon: the list, orbits, sizes, discovery (Explorer)JPL Solar System Dynamics planetary satellite mean elements, physical parameters and discovery circumstances (ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sats/, accessed 7 October 2026): 115 moons of Jupiter, 293 of Saturn, 29 of Uranus, 16 of Neptune, 5 of Pluto, 2 of Mars. Solar System Dynamics, JPL (site manager R. S. Park); the ephemerides behind the mean elements by R. A. Jacobson, M. Brozović and colleaguesNASA/JPL, public; cited as SSD asks: "Solar System Dynamics. (2026, October 7). Planetary Satellite Mean Elements [and Physical Parameters, Discovery Circumstances]. https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov"
The latest moons cross-checked; absolute magnitudes for the sizes of the irregular moonsIAU Minor Planet Center: MPECs 2025-E153 to E155, 2025-H210/211, 2026-F09 to F14, 2026-G43 to G75, 2026-M19, and the Natural Satellites Ephemeris Service's one-line elements (minorplanetcenter.net/iau/NatSats/)published
Irregular moons' positions: mean orbits fitted to JPL's ephemerides (Explorer)JPL Horizons osculating elements every 20 days, 1950 to each ephemeris's end (jup347-jup349, sat455-sat459, ura117, nep104, nep105), fitted with straight-line node, periapsis and mean longitude; Solar System Dynamics, JPLpublic
Sizes from brightness: assumed albedosJupiter 0.04: Grav, T. et al. (2015), ApJ 809:3 (NEOWISE); Saturn 0.06: Ashton, E. et al., PSJ (arXiv:2503.07081); Uranus and Neptune 0.10: Sheppard, S. S. et al. (2024), AJ 168:258. Inner moons: Karkoschka, E. (2001), Icarus 151:51; Showalter, M. R. and Lissauer, J. J. (2006), Science 311:973; Showalter, M. R. et al. (2019), Nature 566:350; El Moutamid, M. et al., CBET 5593 (2025)published
Moon groups (Himalia, Ananke, Carme, Pasiphae; Inuit, Gallic and Norse and their subgroups; Caliban, Sao, Neso)Nesvorný, D. et al. (2003), AJ 126:398; Sheppard, S. S. and Jewitt, D. C. (2003), Nature 423:261; Sheppard, S. S. et al. (2018), RNAAS 2:155; (2023), RNAAS 7:100; (2024), AJ 168:258; Gladman, B. et al. (2001), Nature 412:163; Ashton, E. et al. (2025), RNAAS 9:57 and PSJ (arXiv:2503.07081); Showalter, M. R. and Lissauer, J. J. (2006); Jewitt, D. and Haghighipour, N. (2007), ARA&A 45:261published
The dwarf planets' moons: Dysnomia, Hiʻiaka, Namaka, MK2, Vanth, Weywot, XiangliuHoller, B. J. et al. (2021), Icarus 355:114130; Proudfoot, B. C. N. et al. (2024), PSJ 5:69; (2025), arXiv:2511.07351; Grundy, W. M. et al. (2019), Icarus 334:62; Kiss, C. et al. (2019), Icarus 334:3; Parker, A. H. et al. (2016), ApJL 825:L9; sizes: Brown, M. E. and Butler, B. J. (2023), PSJ 4:193; Sickafoose, A. A. et al. (2019), Icarus 319:657; Fernández-Valenzuela, E. et al. (2025, 2026)published
Eris, Haumea, Makemake, Orcus, Quaoar, Gonggong (never imaged: ellipsoids)Sicardy, B. et al. (2011), Nature 478:493; Szakáts, R. et al. (2023), A&A 669:L3; Ortiz, J. L. et al. (2017), Nature 550:219; Rabinowitz, D. L. et al. (2006), ApJ 639:1238; Brown, M. E. (2013), ApJL 767:L7; Hromakina, T. A. et al. (2019), A&A 625:A46; Brown, M. E. and Butler, B. J. (2018), AJ 156:164; Thirouin, A. et al. (2010), A&A 522:A93; Margoti, G. et al. (2026), arXiv:2607.06450; Pereira, C. L. et al. (2023), A&A 673:L4; Kiss, C. et al. (2019); Pál, A. et al. (2016), AJ 151:117; orbits and positions: JPL SBDB and Horizonspublished; JPL public

Asteroids, comets and the Sun

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Asteroid and comet positions in the viewer (any date)NASA JPL Horizons (ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons), heliocentric vectors from its integration of each JPL Small-Body Database orbit solution, sampled every 8 to 120 days 1950-2450 (Bennu to 2135, where its ephemeris ends; two-body motion from its SBDB elements after); orbit classes from the SBDBNASA, public
The interstellar visitors' paths (1I/'Oumuamua, 2I/Borisov, 3I/ATLAS)NASA JPL Horizons round each passage (every 12 h or a day, eight years), and two-body motion on their hyperbolic SBDB elements beyond (within 0.12 degrees of Horizons where the two meet)NASA, public
The Sun's mean corona in the viewer's eclipse viewBaumbach, S. (1937), Astronomische Nachrichten 263:121, as given in Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, 4th ed. (Cox 2000): the K and F corona's brightness against distancepublished

Spacecraft and missions

WhatSourceLicence or terms
The ISS, Hubble and Tiangong's orbits now (Explorer, Live mode)Orbital elements: CelesTrak (celestrak.org) GP data, from the 18th and 19th Space Defense Squadrons, US Space Command, via Space-Track.org; fetched within CelesTrak's usage policyfree public data, credited
Live video from the ISS (Explorer, Live mode: the ISS card's Watch live from the ISS)Sen's live 4K video of Earth from its cameras on the International Space Station, its YouTube channel's live stream (youtube.com), shown in YouTube's embedded player (privacy-enhanced), loaded only when asked forSen; embedded as YouTube's terms allow, the channel permitting embedding
Their positionsSGP4: Vallado, D. A., Crawford, P., Hujsak, R. and Kelso, T. S. (2006), Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3, AIAA 2006-6753; satellite.js 7.1.0, Shashwat Kandadai and contributorsMIT
The country or ocean under themNatural Earth, 1:50m admin-0 countries and 1:10m marine areaspublic domain
The James Webb Space Telescope's path, launch to October 2031 (Explorer, Live mode: the telescope, its halo orbit and the Sun-Earth L2 point)NASA JPL Horizons (ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons), target -170: NASA Goddard Flight Dynamics Facility's reconstructed trajectory from tracking, then its predictions (the 28-day and five-year plans); the L2 point: Horizons 32, the Sun and Earth-Moon barycentre's L2NASA, public
Sputnik 1's orbit, 4 October 1957 to 4 January 1958 (Explorer, Live mode: on a date in its flight)Reconstructed for this project (no NORAD element sets for 1957 are public) from: Eckels, A., Koidan, R., Harris, I. and Jastrow, R., Ephemeris of Satellite 1957 Alpha 2 (NASA Theoretical Division, IGY Satellite Report Series No. 8, 1959; NASA technical document 19900066808), its Table 1 elements and sub-satellite tables for 5 to 25 October 1957 (Minitrack and University of Illinois interferometer tracking); the decay fitted to NASA NSSDCA's orbit history for 1957-001B (periods 25 October and 25 December, heights 9 and 25 December, reentry); CelesTrak SATCAT (NORAD 1 and 2); J. McDowell's GCAT catalogue (planet4589.org); IKI RAN, 4 October 1957: the beginning of the space age (2007); the insertion at 295.4 s after Korolev et al., "Main results of the launch..." (as quoted by Wikipedia). Good to about 10 km 5 to 25 October; after that the plane to about a degree and the timing drifting to tens of minutes by late DecemberNASA documents, public; published figures
Sputnik 1's beep (the card's Play)Sputnik 1's radio signal as recorded on the ground: File:Sputnik_beep.ogg, Wikimedia Commons, from NASApublic domain (NASA)
Apollo 11 from launch to splashdown, Mission Control and the crew (the Apollo 11 paths' Audio and Transcript, at 1x)NASA Johnson Space Center's tapes 155 to 173, 178 to 181, 187, 188 and 313-AAA (public affairs loop with the air-to-ground), digitised by JSC's Houston Audio Control Room: Internet Archive, Apollo11Audio; credit NASA. Each line is pinned to the mission clock by matching a machine transcript of each tape against NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Air-to-Ground Voice Transcription (timed to the second); the announcer's commentary while out of contact by his own time calls (to the minute). Behind the Moon, where NASA's transcript has no lines, the announcer's marks to the burns and to the acquisition of signal. Checked against the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal: program alarm 0.9 s, go for landing 3.6 s, contact light 0.4 s; and the Apollo Flight Journal at lunar orbit insertion: going around the corner 1.5 s, reading you the same 1.3 s, "like perfect" 0.8 s, the second burn's report 3.0 sPublic domain (Public Domain Mark on the item; NASA recordings)
Artemis II round the Moon, Integrity and Houston (the Artemis II flyby and whole-mission paths' Audio, at 1x)The Orion-to-Earth voice loops (O/E-1, O/E-2) for 6 and 7 April 2026 and their transcripts: Artemis II Lunar Science Team (2026), Artemis II Mission Audio Data Bundle, Planetary Data System, Cartography and Imaging Sciences Node; credit NASA. Each line at the UTC its transcript gives (machine transcribed, checked by the Lunar Science Team); the recording's cuts (the crew's sleep) and silences left outNASA data in the Planetary Data System, open for public use; NASA's Artemis Audio Library: free to download and cleared for use under NASA's media usage guidelines
The Moon finer along Apollo 11's descent and ascent (Explorer: the deeper tiles, levels 4 to 7, about 83 m)LROC WAC empirically normalised 643 nm mosaic (100 m) over the globe's 8k colour; SLDEM2015 relief (LOLA and SELENE Terrain Camera, 512 ppd; Barker et al. 2016), PDS Imaging and Geosciences nodes; credit NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University; NASA/JAXAPublic domain (NASA); SLDEM2015 in the PDS, open
Tranquility Base's ground (Explorer: levels 8 to 12, 2.6 m; 13 and 14, 0.65 m, within 700 m of the site)LROC NAC DTM of the Apollo 11 site (NAC_DTM_APOLLO11, 2 m) and its orthophotos (M150361817, 2 m and 0.5 m; the 0.5 m read in a window), PDS Imaging node; the photos' own shading divided out by the relief (their Sun fitted: 58 deg from overhead, from the west; the 0.5 m photo's shading finer than 2 m stays, held within 0.6 to 1.5). Photographed in 2011: what Apollo 11 left (the descent stage and its shadow, the experiments to its south) filled from the ground 70 m away, as the paths show the ground before it was there; the blast zone's brightening and the astronauts' tracks are the 2011 ground's. Its relief also as geometry from 200 m out from the site (the craft and the cameras near it on the plain sphere), against the ground's ~400 m mean; credit NASA/GSFC/Arizona State UniversityPublic domain (NASA)
The Cape under Apollo 11's launch (Explorer: the day map's deeper tiles, levels 8 to 15; 1.2 m a pixel within 1.4 km of Launch Complex 39A, 2.4 m to 5 km, 4.8 m to 15 km, 9.6 m under the launch's first 60 km of height, coarser to 160 km)USDA National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) aerial photographs through USGS The National Map's NAIP image service, near the pad; Copernicus Sentinel-2C Level-2A true colour, one clear pass on 17 April 2025 (tiles 17RLK to 17RPP; Element 84's Earth Search copy, AWS open data), under the launch; around them the Blue Marble Next Generation 500 m (NASA, via GIBS), which the colours turn to by 130 km and the tiles into by 160 km. Modern imagery, not 1969: at Launch Complex 39A the fixed service structure and its shadow, SpaceX's Starship tower, tanks and their ground and its Horizontal Integration Facility are painted out (filled from the hardstand, mown grass and the crawlerway beside them); the hardstand, flame trench, crawlerway, the LOX and LH2 spheres and the perimeter road were there in 1969; Pad 39B's three lightning towers, the newer buildings round the Cape and the 1970s and later roads stay. Water is drawn in the Blue Marble's colour with the imagery's own ripplesUSDA Farm Service Agency, USGS The National Map; contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2025 (ESA); NASA Earth Observatory, Reto Stöckli (Blue Marble)NAIP public domain; Copernicus Sentinel data free and open, with attribution
Fine relief below the data (Explorer, the Moon close up)Illustrative, made for the Explorer: a crater field with the maria's small-crater size-frequency slope and regolith roughness, drawn only where the map is coarser than its cratersOurs; illustrative, not data
A lander's dust (Explorer: Eagle's last 32 m)Illustrative, ours: a thin sheet of streaks flowing out from under the engine, a degree or two off the ground, as the Apollo descent films show it; its onset at 32 m and its strength by the height are ours (Aldrin at 102:45:17: "Kicking up some dust")Ours; illustrative, not data
Hubble in Live mode and the galleryNASA 3D Resources, Hubble Space Telescope (B) (the engineering CAD), reassembled in metres; the wings ours at the third-generation arrays' 7.1 x 2.6 m (NASA, Hubble's Electrical Power System), the antennas deployed and the aperture door opened, for the telescope as it has flown since 2009; the skin, its panel images, the logotype and the wings' placement ours from NASA's STS-125 photos (S125-E-011766, -011780, -010160, -006928); the optics ours from NASA's HST Media Reference Guide and the published optical prescription (Hubble (A), DigitalSpace Corporation, was the first version)NASA media usage guidelines, credited
The James Webb Space Telescope in Live mode and the galleryNASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, James Webb Space Telescope (A) (NASA 3D Resources); one segment of its momentum flap put back in placeNASA media usage guidelines, credited
Tiangong in Live mode and the gallery: our own model, from published sizesTianhe 16.6 m by 4.2 m (Xinhua; SpaceNews), Wentian and Mengtian 17.9 m by 4.2 m, the ports (Wikipedia's Tiangong, Tianhe, Wentian and Mengtian articles and their sources); the laboratories' arrays, each wing over 100 m² (China News Service, 25 July 2022), the pair spanning over 55 m (People's Daily, 26 September 2022); Tianhe's arrays 67 m² (China News Service); Wang, X. et al. (2023), Design and Application Prospect of China's Tiangong Space Station, Space: Science & Technology, doi:10.34133/space.0035; the arrays' layout and sizes, the laboratories' sections and the visiting ships measured from the China Manned Space Agency's photographs of the whole station (Shenzhou-16's fly-around, 30 October 2023, released 30 November 2023; reference only, not reproduced); the docking mechanism, our model from published facts: androgynous peripheral type with guide petals turned inward, based on APAS (Wikipedia, Chinese Docking Mechanism; Zhengzhou Evening News, 1 November 2011), three capture latches (China News, 3 November 2011), twelve hooks (Spaceflight Now, 2 November 2011), 0.8 m passage, about 1.4 m across (Astronautix); the ports: Wang Xiang and Wang Wei, Chinese Science Bulletin 67(34), 2022; the hatches' sizes: CAST's Zhang Hao (rmzxw.com.cn, 2 September 2022); the arm's adapters and the cameras: Liu et al., HIT, ASTRA 2023, and CMSA video; Wentian's small arm (nearly 6 m, seven joints, symmetric, an end effector at each end, carried outside the airlock section, a storage configuration): The Paper (thepaper.cn, 24 July and 5 August 2022), its parked pose ours; the fluid loops radiating through the white hull: CAST via Beijing News (2022); the visiting ships' main engines, four of 2,500 N on Shenzhou's service module (Spaceflight101, Shenzhou spacecraft overview) and four of 490 N on Tianzhou's propulsion module (Wikipedia, Tianzhou (spacecraft); NextSpaceflight), their nozzles' sizes not published (ours); hull relief, quilting and targets our own imagesfacts, cited

Spacecraft visits

The whole scene

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Brightness of the planets and moons as points (Explorer, Surroundings): geometric albedosNASA Planetary Fact Sheets (nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet), the planets', the Moon's and Pluto's; Ceres about 0.09 (Li et al. 2016, ApJL 817, L22, from Dawn); Eris 0.96 (Sicardy et al. 2011, Nature 478, 493); Makemake 0.77 (Ortiz et al. 2012, Nature 491, 566); Haumea 0.51 (Ortiz et al. 2017, Nature 550, 219); every other body nominal (0.1 for small bodies, 0.3 for moons), so their points' brightness is approximateNASA, public; published
Size comparison: Manhattan's outlineNYC Department of City Planning, Borough Boundaries (NYC Open Data, gthc-hcne), accessed 7 October 2026NYC Open Data terms of use (free use, credited)
Size comparison: Greater London and WalesOffice for National Statistics, Regions (December 2023) and Countries (December 2023) Boundaries, BUC, accessed 7 October 2026Open Government Licence v3.0; contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2023
Size comparison: Great BritainNatural Earth 1:50m admin-0 countriespublic domain
Size comparison: Mount Everest's height8,848.86 m, the joint China-Nepal survey announced 8 December 2020fact
Size comparison: a football pitch105 m by 68 m, the size FIFA recommends for international matches (IFAB Laws of the Game, Law 1; FIFA Football Stadiums, 2011); outline drawn by usfact
Size comparison: the Great Pyramid's basemean side 230.36 m, J. H. Cole, Determination of the Exact Size and Orientation of the Great Pyramid of Giza, Survey of Egypt paper 39 (1925); square drawn by usfact
Size comparison: the Burj Khalifa's height828 m to tip, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, The Skyscraper Center; the stepped profile is schematic, drawn by usfact
Size comparison: the Golden Gate BridgeGolden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Bridge Design and Construction Statistics (total length 2,737 m, main span 1,280 m, side spans 343 m, towers 227 m above water, clearance 67 m); side view drawn by us, cables schematicfact
Size comparison: Central ParkCentral Park Conservancy (843 acres, 2.5 miles by 0.5 miles, 59th to 110th Street, Fifth Avenue to Central Park West); a rectangle drawn by us, turned 29 degrees east of north with Manhattan's gridfact

Listening to the deep-space craft

Live: NASA's Deep Space Network Now (eyes.nasa.gov/dsn; its dsn.xml and config.xml, NASA/JPL-Caltech): which dish at Goldstone, Madrid and Canberra is hearing or commanding which craft, the signal's rate, band and strength, the craft's range; read in the browser every 10 seconds in Live mode. NASA data, public; credited NASA/JPL-Caltech.

Earth in the Explorer

The Explorer's Earth layers.

BodyMapCreditLicence
Earth day by month (Explorer, Seasons layer)Blue Marble Next Generation, January to December 2004NASA Earth Observatory, Reto Stöckli (MODIS)public domain
Earth's daily imagery and clouds (Explorer layers)NASA GIBS corrected reflectance: VIIRS NOAA-20, VIIRS Suomi NPP, MODIS Terra, for the date shownWe acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS)NASA open data (CC0)
Geostationary full disc (Explorer layer)GOES-East and GOES-West ABI GeoColor, every 10 minutes, through NASA GIBSCIRA/NOAA; NASA GIBS (ESDIS)public domain (NOAA); credit CIRA/NOAA
Earthquakes (Explorer layer)USGS ComCat GeoJSON summary, M2.5 and up, the 24 hours before the time shown; event magnitude, depth, origin/update times, felt reports, review, shaking intensity, PAGER alert and station count where suppliedU.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Hazards Programpublic domain
Active fires (Explorer layer)NASA FIRMS thermal anomalies: VIIRS NOAA-20, VIIRS Suomi NPP, MODIS Terra, through GIBSWe acknowledge the use of data and imagery from LANCE FIRMS operated by NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) with funding provided by NASA HeadquartersNASA open data (CC0)
Every active satellite (Explorer layer)CelesTrak GP data, the active group; SGP4 by satellite.jsCelesTrak (celestrak.org), from the 18th and 19th Space Defense Squadrons (USSPACECOM) via Space-Track.orgno licence stated; CelesTrak's usage policy kept
Sound pulse: cities (Explorer)Natural Earth 1:110m populated placesNatural Earthpublic domain
Sound pulse: speeds of sound and Hunga Tonga's pressure wave (Explorer)Earth: ICAO Standard Atmosphere (Doc 7488/3); Venus: Petculescu, A. & Lueptow, R. M. (2007), Icarus 186:413 (worked out, c = √(γRT/M): about 410 m/s at the surface); the giant planets (worked out at 1 bar, c = √(γRT/M) for the mixture): Miguel, Y. & Vazan, A. (2023), Remote Sensing 15:681 (the 1-bar temperatures and helium), NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69 (normal hydrogen's heat capacities at 1 bar); Mars: Maurice, S. et al. (2022), Nature 605:653 (Perseverance SuperCam); Titan: Hagermann, A. et al. (2007), Icarus 189:538 (Huygens); Hunga Tonga: Burt, S. (2022), Weather 77(3):76, doi:10.1002/wea.4182 (the barometer arrivals and the 315 m/s first passage) and Matoza, R. S. et al. (2022), Science 377:95, doi:10.1126/science.abo7063 (the Lamb wave's passages)the authorscited facts
Cutaway: the layers inside Earth, the Moon, Mars and the Sun (Explorer)Earth: PREM, Dziewonski, A. M. & Anderson, D. L. (1981), Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25:297; the Moon: Briaud, A. et al. (2023), Nature 617:743 (core radii), Weber, R. C. et al. (2011), Science 331:309 (the partly molten layer), Wieczorek, M. A. et al. (2013), Science 339:671 (GRAIL crust); Mars: Khan, A. et al. (2023), Nature 622:718 and Samuel, H. et al. (2023), Nature 622:712 (the core and its molten layer), Huang, Q. et al. (2022), PNAS 119:e2204474119 (the mantle's transition), Wieczorek, M. A. et al. (2022), JGR Planets 127:e2022JE007298 (crust); the Sun: Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Gough, D. O. & Thompson, M. J. (1991), ApJ 378:413 (the convection zone's base, 0.713 R), Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. et al. (1996), Science 272:1286 (the core, about 0.25 R). The radii only; the colours are ours, by materialthe authorscited facts
Winds (Explorer layer)NOAA GFS 10 m wind, 1°, the run nearest the dateNOAA NCEP, via NOAA Open Data Dissemination on AWSpublic domain
Earth near the ground (Explorer: the day and night maps continued)Blue Marble Next Generation 500 m; Black Marble 2016NASA Earth Observatory, Reto Stöckli (MODIS); Suomi NPP VIIRS; via NASA GIBS (ESDIS)public domain
Earth close detail (Explorer and spacecraft visits)Sentinel-2 cloudless 2016, 10 m nominal source imagery; the WGS84 tiles are resampled to the globe's gridEOX IT Services GmbH. Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2016 & 2017CC BY 4.0; 2016 edition only. Public WMTS under fair-use access, no SLA. Dated mosaic, not current weather; gaps/network failures use the base map.
ISS · Sen camera comparisonCamera types and mounting context: Sen SpaceTV-1, on Bartolomeo outside ColumbusSen; orbit position from the existing CelesTrak/satellite.js sources aboveOur approximate camera uses the ISS centre and nominal LVLH, not measured mounting/attitude. Nadir and forward horizon; adjustable vertical FOV and model time offset. No claim of calibrated video alignment.
Moon geology (Explorer layer)Unified Geologic Map of the Moon, 1:5,000,000Fortezzo, C. M., Spudis, P. D. and Harrel, S. L. (2020), USGS Astrogeology; via NASA Moon Trekpublic domain
Mars geology (Explorer layer)Geologic Map of Mars, USGS SIM 3292Tanaka, K. L. et al. (2014), USGS; via NASA Mars Trekpublic domain
Mercury enhanced colour (Explorer layer)MESSENGER MDIS enhanced colour mosaic, 665 mNASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington; USGS Astrogeology; via NASA Mercury Trekpublic domain
Elevation (Explorer layers: Moon, Mars, Venus, Ceres)Colour scales computed from LOLA (CGI Moon Kit), MGS MOLA 463 m, Magellan altimetry (GTDR), Dawn HAMO DTMNASA's Scientific Visualization Studio and NASA/GSFC LOLA team; NASA/JPL/GSFC MOLA Science Team and USGS Astrogeology; NASA/JPL/MIT (Ford and Pettengill 1992) and USGS Astrogeology; NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDApublic domain
Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune by year (Explorer layers)Hubble OPAL global colour maps, 2015 to 2025 (Saturn from 2018)NASA, ESA, A. Simon (NASA Goddard), M. H. Wong (UC Berkeley) and the OPAL team (HST GO13937 and successors; STScI MAST, doi:10.17909/T9G593)public domain; acknowledgement requested by the OPAL team
Io's hot spots (Explorer layer)Juno JIRAM hot spot catalogue, orbits 10 to 33Zambon, F. et al. (2023), Io Hot Spot Distribution Detected by Juno/JIRAM, Geophysical Research Letters 50, e2022GL100597; catalogue doi:10.5281/zenodo.7487894CC BY 4.0
Mars's landers and rovers (Explorer layer)Landing and crash sites, rovers' last places and distancesNASA/JPL-Caltech (mission pages and the MSL and Mars 2020 traverse maps), the HiRISE team (NASA/JPL/University of Arizona: the Mars 3, Beagle 2 and Schiaparelli identifications), ESA, CNSA, and the papers cited for each craftfacts; no licence needed
The Sun now (Explorer layer)GOES-19 SUVI composites, the last dayNOAA Space Weather Prediction Center; NOAA NCEIpublic domain

Maps, shapes, pictures and landings in the Explorer

Maps

The Explorer shows each map's credit beside its globe.

BodyMapCreditLicence
Mars colourViking MDIM 2.1 colorized global mosaic, 232 m (read at 16k)NASA/JPL/USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Mars reliefMGS MOLA global DEM, 463 mNASA/JPL/GSFC MOLA Science Team; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
MimasCassini global map, June 2017 (PIA17214)NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institutepublic domain
DioneCassini - Voyager global mosaic, 154 mNASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
RheaCassini - Voyager global mosaic, 417 mNASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
TitanCassini ISS global mosaic, 4 km, 938 nm (PIA19658)NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
IapetusCassini - Voyager global mosaicNASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Pluto, CharonNew Horizons LORRI and MVIC global mosaics, 300 m, July 2017 (unimaged areas left blank)NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Moon south pole reliefLOLA 20 m south-pole DEM (as Shackleton, above)NASA/GSFC LOLA teampublic domain
SunSynoptic chart from 29 daily SDO/HMI flattened intensitygrams, 22 April to 20 May 2024 (a moment's picture, not a map)Courtesy of NASA/SDO and the HMI science teampublic domain (SDO data policy; credit requested)
Mercury colourMESSENGER MDIS Basemap BDR, 166 m (read at 16k)NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Mercury reliefMESSENGER MDIS global DEM, 665 m, v2 (K. Becker, USGS)NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Venus (radar)Magellan SAR C3-MIDR global mosaic, 2025 m; the 8.7% with no data (strips and polar caps) filled smooth from the surrounding brightness for the viewer, never with invented groundNASA/JPL; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Venus reliefMagellan altimetry, Global Topographic Data Record, 4641 m: Ford, P. G. and Pettengill, G. H. (1992)NASA/JPL/MIT; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
UranusOne colour, measured from Voyager 2's true-colour view (PIA00032)NASA/JPLpublic domain
Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, OberonVoyager 2 mosaics, 1440 x 720 (southern hemispheres; the north never imaged), via NASA 3D ResourcesNASA/JPL-Caltech/USGSpublic domain
PhobosViking mosaic, DLR-controlled, 40 px/deg: Wählisch, M. et al. (2010), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294:547NASA/JPL; DLR; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Deimos, Eros, Itokawa, Ida, GaspraGlobal photomosaics: Stooke, P., Stooke Small Bodies Maps V3.0, MULTI-SA-MULTI-6-STOOKEMAPS-V3.0, NASA Planetary Data System (2015); images Viking/MRO, NEAR Shoemaker, Hayabusa (JAXA), GalileoPhil Stooke (University of Western Ontario); NASA, JAXApublic domain, credit required
VestaDawn FC HAMO global mosaic, 60 m (DLR)NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Ceres reliefDawn HAMO stereo DTM, 137 m: Preusker, F. et al. (2016), LPSC 47:1954NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
BennuOSIRIS-REx PolyCam global basemap (shape v28): Bennett, C. A. et al. (2021), Icarus 357:113690NASA/Goddard/University of Arizona; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
ArrokothLORRI albedo map with the shape model: Porter, S. B. et al. (2024), NASA PDS Small Bodies NodeNASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institutepublic domain
PhoebeCassini ISS global mosaic, Phoebe atlas sheet SP_1M_0_0 (COISS_3001, NASA PDS Rings Node), 8 px/degNASA/JPL/Space Science Institute; map by T. Roatsch et al., DLRpublic domain (NASA PDS)
AmaltheaDrawn shaded-relief map from Voyager and Galileo images: Stooke, P., Stooke Small Bodies Maps V3.0, MULTI-SA-MULTI-6-STOOKEMAPS-V3.0, NASA Planetary Data System (2015)Phil Stooke (University of Western Ontario); NASApublic domain, credit required
Sun, its wavelengths (one moment, 14 May 2024, about 17:00 UTC, eight minutes after the X8.7 flare)SDO/AIA 94, 131, 171, 193, 211, 304, 335, 1600 and 1700 Å; SDO/HMI continuum and magnetogram: full-disc images in each instrument's standard colour table, rendered by the Helioviewer Project (helioviewer.org) from the JPEG 2000 archiveCourtesy of NASA/SDO and the AIA, EVE, and HMI science teams. Visualizations provided by the ESA/NASA Helioviewer Projectpublic domain (SDO data policy; credit as given)
Sun, the outer corona (same moment)SOHO/LASCO C2 (2.2 to 6 solar radii) and C3 (3.7 to 30), white light, via HelioviewerCourtesy of SOHO/LASCO consortium (NRL, MPS, LAM, University of Birmingham). SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA. Visualizations provided by the ESA/NASA Helioviewer Projectfree for non-commercial use with credit ("Courtesy of SOHO/LASCO consortium. SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA")
Sun, more moments: a filament eruption (31 Aug 2012, 20:45 UTC), a huge coronal hole (18 May 2016, 12:00), the quiet Sun near solar minimum (20 Nov 2019, 12:00) and the total eclipse's greatest moment (8 Apr 2024, 18:17)The same SDO/AIA, SDO/HMI and SOHO/LASCO channels, rendered by the Helioviewer Project; a channel with no image within an hour (three for LASCO) is left outCourtesy of NASA/SDO and the AIA, EVE, and HMI science teams. Courtesy of SOHO/LASCO consortium; SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA. Visualizations provided by the ESA/NASA Helioviewer Projectpublic domain (SDO); LASCO free for non-commercial use with credit
Sun, all-round views (23 Jul 2012 02:15 UTC; 6 Feb 2011 12:00 UTC)STEREO-A and STEREO-B SECCHI/EUVI 171, 195, 284 and 304 Å with SDO/AIA 171, 193, 211 and 304 Å, near-simultaneous JPEG 2000 images from Helioviewer, each projected from its spacecraft's header position onto a sphere 0.5 to 2% above the photosphere and blended towards each disc's centre, EUVI matched to AIA by brightness quantiles, in AIA's colour tables. The 23 July 2012 moment: Baker, D. N. et al. (2013), Space Weather 11:585Courtesy of NASA/STEREO and the STEREO/SECCHI consortium. Courtesy of NASA/SDO and the AIA, EVE, and HMI science teams. Visualizations provided by the ESA/NASA Helioviewer Projectfree for non-commercial use with credit (STEREO: "Courtesy of STEREO/[instrument] consortium" or "STEREO (NASA)"); SDO public domain
Sun, rotation maps: magnetogram (Carrington rotations 2126 and 2284)HMI synoptic maps of the radial field, hmi.Synoptic_Mr, from the Joint Science Operations Center (JSOC), Stanford; resampled from sine latitudeCourtesy of NASA/SDO and the HMI science team; JSOC, Stanford Universitypublic domain (SDO data policy; credit requested)
Sun, rotation maps: HMI continuum and AIA 94, 131, 171, 193, 211, 304, 335, 1600 and 1700 Å (CR 2126 and 2284)Built here from one SDO JPEG 2000 image a day (00:00 UTC, from Helioviewer), each day's strip within about 9 degrees of its central meridian: built over one 27-day rotation, not one momentCourtesy of NASA/SDO and the AIA, EVE, and HMI science teams. Visualizations provided by the ESA/NASA Helioviewer Projectpublic domain (SDO data policy; credit requested)
Stars behind the bodies (optional)Deep Star Maps 2020, as the film's (above), asinh-stretched to an 8k and a 4k WebPNASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio; Gaia DR2: ESA/Gaia/DPACpublic domain (NASA); Gaia data CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO, Gaia credit required (shown on screen)

Layers (from 2026-10-22)

More layers on the worlds, each credited on screen while it is on. Not in a frame: move a row to "Earth in the Explorer" above if one ever is.

BodyMapCreditLicence
Earth, Sea temperatureGHRSST Level 4 MUR global foundation sea surface temperature v4.1, the date, through NASA GIBSJPL MUR MEaSUREs Project, NASA PO.DAAC (doi:10.5067/GHGMR-4FJ04); NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Earth, Snow and sea iceMODIS/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3 Global 500 m (MOD10A1 v6.1); the MUR v4.1 analysis's sea ice, the date, through NASA GIBSHall, D. K. and Riggs, G. A., NASA NSIDC DAAC; JPL MUR MEaSUREs Project, NASA PO.DAAC; NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Earth, Haze and dustMODIS/Terra aerosol optical depth, 3 km (MOD04_3K v6.1), the date, through NASA GIBSNASA LAADS DAAC (MODIS Atmosphere team); NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Earth, Ocean planktonMODIS/Aqua Level-2 ocean colour chlorophyll a (MODISA_L2_OC 2022.0), the date, through NASA GIBSNASA Ocean Biology DAAC (OB.DAAC); NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Earth, VegetationMODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices Monthly L3 1 km (MOD13A3 v6.1), NDVI, the date's month, through NASA GIBSNASA LP DAAC; NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Earth, Land temperatureMODIS/Terra Land Surface Temperature Monthly L3 0.05 degree (MOD11C3 v6.1), daytime, the date's month, through NASA GIBSNASA LP DAAC; NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Earth, City lights, the nightNASA Black Marble VNP46A2 (VIIRS Suomi NPP gap-filled, lunar BRDF-adjusted nighttime lights), the date, through NASA GIBSRomán, M. O. et al. (2018), Remote Sensing of Environment 210:113; NASA LAADS DAAC; NASA GIBS (ESDIS)NASA open data; GIBS acknowledgement
Moon, LROC mosaicLROC WAC global mosaic, 643 nm, 100 m (2009 to 2011), through NASA Moon TrekNASA/GSFC/Arizona State University; Speyerer, E. J. et al. (2011), LPSC 42:2387public domain
Moon, Colour ratioClementine UVVIS warped colour-ratio mosaic, 200 m (USGS, 2008), through NASA Moon TrekUSGS Astrogeology Science Center; Clementine (BMDO/NASA)public domain ("please cite authors")
Moon, IronClementine UVVIS FeO weight percentLucey, P. G., Blewett, D. T. and Jolliff, B. L. (2000), JGR 105:20297; USGS Astrogeology; via NASA Moon Trekpublic domain
Moon, ThoriumLunar Prospector gamma-ray spectrometer thorium, half a degree (1998 to 1999)Lawrence, D. J. et al. (2003), JGR 108:5102; LP Spectrometer Team (PDS Geosciences); via NASA Moon Trekpublic domain
Moon, Crust thicknessGRAIL crustal thickness, model 1Wieczorek, M. A. et al. (2013), Science 339:671; NASA/JPL-Caltech/MIT/GSFC; via NASA Moon Trekpublic domain
Moon, HottestLRO Diviner maximum bolometric temperature, half a degree (2009 to 2015)Williams, J.-P. et al. (2017), Icarus 283:300; NASA/GSFC/UCLA; via NASA Moon Trekpublic domain
Mars, Infrared, day and nightMars Odyssey THEMIS daytime and night-time infrared controlled mosaics, 100 m, v2 (October 2018)NASA/JPL-Caltech/Arizona State University; Edwards, C. S. et al. (2011), JGR 116:E10008; via NASA Mars Trekpublic domain
Mars, AlbedoMGS TES albedo, 7.4 kmChristensen, P. R. et al. (2001), JGR 106:23823; NASA/JPL/Arizona State University; via NASA Mars Trekpublic domain
Mars, Thermal inertiaMGS TES nighttime thermal inertiaPutzig, N. E. et al. (2005), Icarus 173:325; via NASA Mars Trekpublic domain
Mercury, ColourMESSENGER MDIS three-colour (MD3) global mosaic, 665 mNASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington; Denevi, B. W. et al. (2018), Space Science Reviews 214:2; via NASA Mercury Trekpublic domain
Mercury, ElevationA colour scale computed here from the MESSENGER MDIS global DEM, 665 m (the relief map's own heights)NASA/JHUAPL/CIW; DEM by K. Becker, USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Mercury, Crust thicknessCrustal thickness from the HgM008 gravity field and MLA topographyGenova, A. et al. (2019), GRL 46:3625; NASA GSFC; via NASA Mercury Trekpublic domain
Titan, Infrared colourCassini VIMS global colour-ratio mosaic (1.59/1.27, 2.03/1.27, 1.27/1.08 µm)Le Mouélic, S. et al. (2019), Icarus 319:121; NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Nantes/University of Arizona; via NASA Titan Trekpublic domain
Titan, RadarCassini RADAR SAR and HiSAR mosaic through T104 (January 2015), preliminaryNASA/JPL-Caltech/ASI/Cassini RADAR team; via NASA Titan Trekpublic domain
Ceres, Dawn, closestDawn Framing Camera LAMO clear-filter global mosaic (about 35 m)NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA; mosaic by DLR (Roatsch, T. et al. 2017, Planetary and Space Science 140:74); via NASA Ceres Trekpublic domain
Styx and Kerberos, shapesTriaxial sizes from New Horizons (Styx about 16 x 9 x 8 km, Kerberos 19 x 10 x 9 km)Weaver, H. A. et al. (2016), Science 351:aae0030cited facts

The Saturn-moon, Pluto and Charon shapes and rotations are the IAU 2015 values, checked against NASA NAIF's pck00011.tpc. Their masses and orbits, and the corrected Moon, Earth and gas-giant figures, are from NASA NSSDCA's planetary fact sheets (from the Internet Archive's 2024 copies).

Shape models

Irregular bodies are drawn from their measured shapes.

BodyShape modelCreditLicence
PhobosGaskell Phobos Shape Model V1.0, 49,152 plates, doi:10.26033/xzv5-bw95; converted to glTFR. W. Gaskell; NASA PDSU.S. public domain (dataset-specific NASA catalogue designation)
DeimosThomas et al., Small Body Optical Shape Models V1.0, doi:10.26033/g5e0-kh52; 5-degree radius grid converted to glTFP. C. Thomas et al.; NASA PDSU.S. public domain (dataset-specific NASA catalogue designation)
VestaDawn gravity science SPC model, 2022 (R. S. Park)NASA/JPL-Caltech; via NASA NAIFpublic domain
Eros, ItokawaGaskell, R. W., Gaskell Eros and Itokawa Shape Models V1.0, NASA PDS (2008)NASA; Hayabusa images JAXApublic domain (NASA PDS, CC0)
RyuguSfM model v20200815 (N. Hirata, University of Aizu, Hayabusa2 Shape Model Team); decimated for the viewerISAS/JAXA; via the NASA NAIF Hayabusa2 SPICE archiveISAS/JAXA data policy (free to use, commercial included, compatible with CC BY 4.0): credit "ISAS/JAXA" and note changes
BennuOLA global shape v21a: Daly, M. G. et al. (2020), Science Advances 6:eabd3649NASA/Goddard/University of Arizonapublic domain
ArrokothPorter, S. B. et al. (2024), NASA PDS Small Bodies NodeNASA/JHUAPL/SwRIpublic domain
67P/Churyumov-GerasimenkoThe SHAP4S model from OSIRIS stereophotogrammetry (DLR): Scholten, F., SPG SHAP4S plate model, RO-C-MULTI-5-67P-SHAPE-V1.0 (2016), after Preusker, F. et al. (2015), A&A 583:A33; via the ESA SPICE Service and Planetary Science ArchiveESA, H. Sierks; ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDACC BY-NC 3.0 IGO (see below)
Lutetia, SteinsFrom OSIRIS images (LAM): Farnham, T. L., Shape model of asteroid 21 Lutetia, RO-A-OSINAC/OSIWAC-5-LUTETIA-SHAPE-V1.0; Farnham, T. L. and Jorda, L., Shape model of asteroid 2867 Steins, RO-A-OSINAC/OSIWAC-5-STEINS-SHAPE-V1.0, NASA PDS (2013); Jorda, L. et al. (2012), Icarus 221:1089 (Steins)ESA, H. Sierks; ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDACC BY-NC 3.0 IGO (ESA archive copies; NASA PDS states none)
Didymos, DimorphosDART stereophotoclinometry from DRACO images (Dimorphos: Daly, R. T. et al. (2024), Planetary Science Journal 5:24); DSKs by the ESA SPICE ServiceNASA/Johns Hopkins APLpublic domain
Ida, GaspraThomas, P. C. et al., Thomas Asteroid and Satellite Shape Models, NASA PDSNASApublic domain
ProteusStooke, P., Stooke Small Bodies Shape Models V1.0, NASA PDS, doi:10.26033/yt84-5y91Phil Stooke; NASApublic domain (NASA PDS; cite as given)
Pan, Daphnis, Atlas, Prometheus, Pandora, Janus, Epimetheus, Telesto, Calypso, Helene, HyperionThomas, P., Joseph, J. and Ansty, T. (2018), Saturn Small Moon Shape Models Bundle V1.0, NASA PDS, doi:10.26033/ewy3-jy61 (Cassini ISS; Thomas, P. C. et al. 2018, Icarus 300:202)NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute; P. C. Thomas (Cornell)public domain (NASA PDS; cite as given)
PhoebeGaskell, R. W. (2020), Gaskell Phoebe Shape Model V1.0, NASA PDS, doi:10.26033/ehkj-xj95 (Cassini ISS, 2012)NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute; R. W. Gaskell (PSI)public domain (NASA PDS; cite as given)
Amalthea, Thebe, LarissaStooke, P., Stooke Small Bodies Shape Models V1.0, NASA PDS, doi:10.26033/yt84-5y91 (Voyager and Galileo images; Larissa's from one image)Phil Stooke; NASApublic domain (NASA PDS; cite as given)
Tempel 1, Hartley 2Thomas, P. C. et al. (2013), Icarus 222:453 (Tempel 1) and 222:550 (Hartley 2); Farnham, T. L. and Thomas, P. C., DIF-C-HRIV/ITS/MRI-5-TEMPEL1-SHAPE-V2.0 and DIF-C-HRIV/MRI-5-HARTLEY2-SHAPE-V1.0, NASA PDS Small Bodies Node (Deep Impact, Stardust-NExT and EPOXI images)NASA/JPL/UMD; P. C. Thomas (Cornell)public domain
Wild 2Kirk, R. L., Duxbury, T. C. et al., Stardust NAVCAM shape model V2.1, SDU-C-NAVCAM-5-WILD2-SHAPE-MODEL-V2.1, NASA PDS; Duxbury, T. C. et al. (2004), JGR 109:E12S02 (the unseen half an ellipsoid)NASA/JPLpublic domain
HalleyStooke, P. (shape) and Abergel, A. (pointing), from Giotto and Vega images; Stooke Small Bodies Shape Models, NASA PDS (very uncertain: 0.5 to 1 km)Phil Stooke, Alain Abergel; ESA, IKIpublic domain (NASA PDS; credit Abergel and Stooke)
MathildeThomas, P. C. et al. (1999), Icarus 140:17, Thomas Asteroid and Satellite Shape Models, NASA PDS (NEAR MSI); the unseen half filled with the ellipsoid fitted to the seen half (adjusted)NASA/JHUAPLpublic domain
ToutatisHudson, R. S. et al. (2003), Icarus 161:346, Small Body Radar Shape Models, NASA PDS (Arecibo and Goldstone radar); its long axis at Chang'e 2's flyby from Zhao, Y. et al. (2015), MNRAS 450:3620NASA/JPL; NAIC; R. S. Hudsonpublic domain
Nix, HydraPorter, S. B. (2021), Shape model of Nix (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12779948) and of Hydra (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12779975), figshare (New Horizons LORRI)Simon Porter (SwRI); NASA/JHUAPL/SwRICC BY 4.0 (credit shown on screen)

Non-commercial: the Rosetta OSIRIS shape models (67P, Lutetia, Steins) are ESA archive data, which ESA distributes under CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO (ESA Space Science Archives terms, checked 6 Oct 2026; the DSK files themselves state no licence). The 67P DSKs are DLR's SHAP4S, not the later SHAP7 of Preusker et al. (2017). They are used unchanged in shape apart from decimation; the converted models are adapted material, credited as above, and go out non-commercially only; any commercial use needs ESA's licence ([email protected]). There is no ShareAlike condition.

The bodies with pictures but no shape model are drawn as ellipsoids of their published size and said so: Borrelly (Deep Space 1 saw one side; the IAU's length and SBDB's mean diameter), Annefrank (Duxbury, T. C. et al. 2004, JGR 109:E02002), Dinkinesh and its moon Selam (Levison, H. F. et al. 2024, Nature 629:1015), Donaldjohanson (NASA, Lucy's first images, 21 Apr 2025), Dactyl (Belton, M. J. S. et al. 1996, Icarus 120:185). The interstellar visitors 1I/'Oumuamua, 2I/Borisov and 3I/ATLAS were never resolved: spheres of their estimated sizes ('Oumuamua ISSI Team 2019, Nature Astronomy 3:594; Jewitt, D. et al. 2020, ApJL 888:L23; Jewitt, D. et al. 2025, ApJL 990:L2). Tempel 1 turns at Deep Impact's rate before its 2011 perihelion and Stardust-NExT's after (the IAU's two epochs); Hartley 2 and Toutatis tumble and are drawn true at their flybys only; Wild 2, Borrelly, Halley, Mathilde and the rest have nominal turns, said in their fact sheets.

The new bodies' sizes and rotations are the IAU 2015 values (checked against pck00011.tpc with SPICE: under 0.0001 degrees), or the mission's own PCK where the IAU has none (Bennu, Ryugu, Didymos; Arrokoth from Porter et al. 2024). Masses are GM from NASA JPL Solar System Dynamics (planetary and satellite physical parameters, the Small-Body Database) divided by G.

Comet 67P landings

Philae's landing (12 November 2014) and Rosetta's end (30 September 2016) on 67P, as the Explorer shows them; each image's credit and licence is shown beside it.

WhatSourceCreditLicence
Comet attitude, comet and Rosetta orbits, framesESA SPICE Service, Rosetta kernels (ROS_V38.TF, CATT_DV_145_02, CATT_DV_257_03, CORB_DV_257_03, RORB_DV_257_03), spiftp.esac.esa.intESA SPICE Service; ESA/ESOC Flight Dynamicsno terms stated; credited (the archived set, Vazquez-Garcia et al. 2017, doi:10.5270/esa-1dfi4i7, is under ESA's archive terms, CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO); only computed positions are published
Philae's descentLORB_SUN_J2000_SDL_V1_1.BSPSONC-FD (CNES), via the ESA SPICE Serviceas above
Philae's bounceLORB_C_G_FIXED_RBD_7_V2_0.BSP, the 7Dwarfs reconstruction (B. Grieger et al., 2019)ESA SPICE Serviceas above
Philae's final positionSPICE_PHILAE_CFF_SONC_V2_0.BSP (SONC-FD, 2017)CNES; ESA SPICE Serviceas above
Site J, the planned targetLORB_DV_047_01 (planned descent, 1 Nov 2014)ESA SPICE Serviceas above
Touchdown times and surfaceBiele, J. et al. (2015), Science 349:aaa9816
Skull-top ridgeO'Rourke, L. et al. (2020), Nature 586:697; ESA release, 28 Oct 2020
SaisESA Rosetta blog, 15 Dec 2016 (touchdown 10:39:34 UT) and 3 Oct 2016 (the name)
OSIRIS: 5.8 km, last image, reconstructed last image (30 Sep 2016)ESA Archive Image Browser originals (imagearchives.esac.esa.int)ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA, CC BY-SA 4.0CC BY-SA 4.0 (ESA, Rosetta image archive complete, June 2018)
NAVCAM, 15:30:32 and 15:35:32 on 12 Nov 2014ESA Archive Image Browser originalsESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM, CC BY-SA IGO 3.0CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (ESA Rosetta blog, 4 Nov 2014)

The OSIRIS and NAVCAM frames are ESA's archive originals: OSIRIS frames under CC BY-SA 4.0 and NAVCAM frames under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO, by ESA's own statements (the archive's 2018 copyright page, read from the Internet Archive, gives both credit lines).

ShareAlike: the web copies of the CC BY-SA images (resized; the NAVCAM frames stretched from 16 bits) are adapted material and go out under the same licence as their source (CC BY-SA 4.0 or 3.0 IGO) with the credit above and a link to the licence, not under the film's CC BY-NC.

Classic pictures of the planets and moons

First photograph of Earth from space (24 October 1946). V-2 No. 13, White Sands, New Mexico; U.S. Army / White Sands Missile Range / Applied Physics Laboratory. Army source and U.S. Army Photo credit, original image. Public domain in the United States as an official U.S. Army photograph. NASA historical context establishes 65 miles (about 105 km), 35 mm film and a frame every 1.5 seconds. Unaltered black-and-white source, resized for the web. Pin at approximately 32.4° N, 106.5° W represents the launch area, not a measured camera position; 105 km altitude and 60° viewing field provide illustrative context. Exact time, pointing and lens are not reconstructed; noon UTC is a date-navigation placeholder.

Classic spacecraft pictures, each pinned on its body where it was taken from and flown to from there: the times from the PDS Ring-Moon Systems Node's OPUS and the image pages, the camera's place from JPL Horizons (the PDS trajectory tables for Galileo at Gaspra and Ida, a published sub-camera point where Horizons has no craft), each range and field checked against the source page. Also newer pictures (2015 on): the Artemis I and II frames timed by their cameras' EXIF clocks from the NASA Image and Video Library, Orion placed from JPL Horizons; BepiColombo's under ESA's licence.

WhatSourceCreditLicence
Pale Blue Dot (Earth, 1990-02-14)PIA00452NASA/JPL-CaltechPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Earth and Moon from Saturn (Earth, 2013-07-19)PIA14949NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Mercury's unseen side (Mercury, 2008-01-14)PIA10172NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of WashingtonPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Venus's clouds from Galileo (Venus, 1990-02-14)PIA00111NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Jupiter with Io and Europa (Jupiter, 1979-02-13)PIA00144NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Cassini's Jupiter portrait (Jupiter, 2000-12-29)PIA04866NASA/JPL/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Io's volcanic face (Io, 1979-03-04)PIA00023NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Io in true colour (Io, 1999-07-02)PIA02308NASA/JPL/University of ArizonaPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Europa's surface (Europa, 1998-03-29)PIA19048NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Juno's Ganymede (Ganymede, 2021-06-07)PIA24681NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Callisto in colour (Callisto, 2001-05-26)PIA03456NASA/JPL/DLRPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Gaspra (Gaspra, 1991-10-29)PIA00118NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Ida and Dactyl (Ida, 1993-08-28)PIA00069NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
In Saturn's shadow (Saturn, 2006-09-15)PIA08329NASA/JPL/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Crescent Saturn (Saturn, 1980-11-16)PIA00335NASA/JPL/USGSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Death Star moon (Mimas, 2010-02-13)PIA12570NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Fountains of Enceladus (Enceladus, 2005-11-27)PIA07758NASA/JPL/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Titan in natural colour (Titan, 2005-04-16)PIA06230NASA/JPL/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Titan's surface (Titan, 2005-01-14)PIA07232NASA/JPL/ESA/University of ArizonaPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); ESA shares the image: credit ESA, and ESA's own terms apply to ESA's copy
Sponge-like Hyperion (Hyperion, 2005-09-25)PIA07740NASA/JPL/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The two faces of Iapetus (Iapetus, 2007-09-10)PIA08384NASA/JPL/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Pan, the ravioli moon (Pan, 2017-03-07)PIA21436NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Uranus from Voyager 2 (Uranus, 1986-01-14)PIA18182NASA/JPL-CaltechPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Miranda's patchwork face (Miranda, 1986-01-24)PIA01490NASA/JPL/USGSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Neptune and the Great Dark Spot (Neptune, 1989-08-20)PIA01492NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Triton's south polar cap (Triton, 1989-08-25)PIA00317NASA/JPL/USGSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Valles Marineris hemisphere (Mars, 1980-02-15)PIA00003NASA/JPL/USGSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Phobos in colour (Phobos, 2008-03-23)PIA10368NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of ArizonaPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Earthrise (Moon, 1968-12-24)as08-14-2383NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Blue Marble (Earth, 1972-12-07)as17-148-22727NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Vesta (Vesta, 2011-07-24)PIA14317NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Ceres and Occator's bright spots (Ceres, 2015-05-06)PIA19562NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Pluto's heart (Pluto, 2015-07-13)PIA20291NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Charon in enhanced colour (Charon, 2015-07-14)PIA19968NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Pluto's mountains, plains and hazes at sunset (Pluto, 2015-07-14)PIA19948NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Pluto's crescent (Pluto, 2015-07-14)PIA20038NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
The icy mountains of Pluto (Pluto, 2015-07-14)PIA19710NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Pluto's rich colours (Pluto, 2015-07-14)PIA19952NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Pluto's blue sky (Pluto, 2015-07-14)PIA19964NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Arrokoth (Arrokoth, 2019-01-01)kuiper-belt-object-arrokoth-2014-mu69NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); JHUAPL/SwRI credit on a NASA mission image
Tempel 1 from the impactor (Tempel 1, 2005-07-04)PIA02127NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMDPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Hartley 2 at closest approach (Hartley 2, 2010-11-04)PIA13570NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMDPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Wild 2 close up (Wild 2, 2004-01-02)PIA06285NASA/JPL-CaltechPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Borrelly (Borrelly, 2001-09-22)PIA03500NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Mathilde (Mathilde, 1997-06-27)PIA02477NASA/JPL/JHUAPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Annefrank (Annefrank, 2002-11-02)PIA02885NASA/JPL-CaltechPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Dinkinesh and Selam (Dinkinesh, 2023-11-01)dinkinesh-firstlook-llorriNASA/Goddard/SwRI/Johns Hopkins APL/NOIRLabPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Donaldjohanson (Donaldjohanson, 2025-04-20)final_0798443319_decNASA/Goddard/SwRI/Johns Hopkins APL/NOIRLabPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Earthset (Moon, 2026-04-06)art002e009288NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Orientale and the setting Earth (Moon, 2026-04-06)art002e009284NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Artemis Era Earthrise (Moon, 2026-04-06)art002e009280bNASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Artemis II in eclipse (Moon, 2026-04-07)art002e009301NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Earth by moonlight (Earth, 2026-04-03)art002e000192NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Orion, the Moon and the Earth (Moon, 2022-11-28)art001e000672NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Earthrise after the return flyby (Moon, 2022-12-05)art001e002083NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Orion snaps a selfie (Earth, 2022-11-18)cmasaw1_20221118204608_034NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The far side beyond Orion (Moon, 2022-11-21)art001e000268NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Moon grows in frame (Moon, 2022-12-03)art001e002000NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The Moon looms beyond Orion (Moon, 2022-12-05)art001e002128NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Victor Glover looks back at Earth (Earth, 2026-04-06)art002e009273NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Jeremy Hansen looks back home (Earth, 2026-04-06)art002e009272NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Reid Wiseman looks at the Moon (Moon, 2026-04-06)art002e009275NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Hansen at the window in the flyby (Moon, 2026-04-06)art002e014256NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Christina Koch and the crescent Earth (Earth, 2026-04-09)art002e041711NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Victor Glover and the crescent Earth (Earth, 2026-04-09)art002e025219NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Earthrise from LRO (Moon, 2015-10-12)GSFC_20171208_Archive_e000496NASA/GSFC/Arizona State UniversityPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
EPIC's first Earth (Earth, 2015-07-06)GSFC_20171208_Archive_e000678NASAPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Juno's Europa close-up (Europa, 2022-09-29)PIA25330NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
Juno's Io (Io, 2023-12-30)io-from-juno-close-flyby-p57NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSSPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA); the page offers 1600 x 1600 px
Mercury's sunlit north (Mercury, 2025-01-08)Mercury's sunlit north viewed by M-CAM 1ESA/BepiColombo/MTMCC BY-SA 3.0 IGO or ESA Standard Licence (content can be used under either licence), as the page states
One of Cassini's last looks at Saturn (Saturn, 2016-10-28)PIA21345NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science InstitutePublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)

Mariner 4's pictures of Mars, 15 July 1965: frames 1, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 17, 18 and 19, the pair mosaics of frames 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 7-8, and the hand-coloured first picture, each pinned at the camera's place on the fitted hyperbola, looking at the frame's published centre; the times, ranges, centres and Sun angles from JPL's Mariner Mars 1964 Bulletin No. 52 (4 August 1965; the scan held by CSIRO Parkes).

WhatSourceCreditLicence
Frame 1, the first close-up picture of another planetPIA14032NASA/JPLPublic domain (NASA images are not copyrighted; NASA media guidelines: credit NASA)
The first picture, coloured by hand at JPLPIA14033NASA/JPL-Caltech/Dan GoodsPublic domain (as above)
Frames 6, 8, 11, 15, 17, 18, 19 and the pair mosaicsNASA NSSDCA Mariner 4 image set (nssdcftp.gsfc.nasa.gov/miscellaneous/planetary/mariner_4/), the copies on Wikimedia CommonsNASA/JPL (NSSDCA)Public domain (as above)
Frame 7, the first picture to show craters beyond doubt"First Picture Clearly Showing Craters on Mars", NASA on The Commons (Flickr), via Wikimedia CommonsNASA/JPLPublic domain (as above; on Flickr: no known copyright restrictions)
Frames 5-8 and 11 laid on the globe (the Explorer's Mars layer "Mariner 4's pictures")The NSSDCA pair mosaics of frames 5-6 and 7-8 (above), placed by their printed orthographic graticule and projection centre, then moved onto today's MOLA frame (-1.21 deg lat, -0.67 lon; -1.43, -1.14), the move fitted by us to the craters of the Viking MDIM 2.1 mosaic; frame 11 (NSSDCA m04_11e) projected from the camera on the fitted hyperbola, its roll (330.5 deg from J2000 north), line of sight and scale fitted by us to MOLA's relief lit by the frame's Sun (MGS MOLA DEM and MDIM 2.1 as in the maps table)NASA/JPL (NSSDCA); placement oursPublic domain (as above)

Other landings and impacts

The Explorer's landing timeline also plays the other real landings and impacts with public trajectories. Only computed positions are published. Where a path is corrected for the picture, the Explorer says so ("adjusted") and how.

WhatSourceCreditLicence
OSIRIS-REx's touch-and-go at Bennu, 20 Oct 2020od294 trajectory (orx_200827_201020_201020_od294_v1.bsp and the contact and back-away files), OSIRIS-REx SPICE archive, naif.jpl.nasa.govKinetX Flight Dynamics; NASA/Goddard/University of Arizonapublic (NASA)
NightingaleLauretta, D. S. et al. (2022), Science 377:285
MASCOT's descent and bounces at Ryugu, 3 Oct 2018hyb2_mascot_lander_v02.bsp (1 s)DLR/CNES; Scholten, F. et al. (2019), A&A 632:L3JAXA data policy: free use, credited ISAS/JAXA
Hayabusa2 over MASCOTlidar_derived_trj_20191114_no6dofc_v03.bsp, Hayabusa2 SPICE archive (doi:10.17597/isas.darts/hyb2-00600)ISAS/JAXAas above
DART's last hour and impact on Dimorphos, 26 Sep 2022dart_2022_*_rec_v03.bsp (radio) and dart_2022_269_2022_269_spc_v04.bsp (DRACO images, the last 48 s; the 7 km join eased over a minute), DART SPICE archiveNASA/Johns Hopkins APLpublic (NASA)
LICIACube over the impactlicia_2022_254_2023_091_rec_v04.bspASI; T. Farnham (University of Maryland)public (NASA archive)
The impactDaly, R. T. et al. (2023), Nature 616:443
NEAR Shoemaker's landing on Eros, 12 Feb 2001near_erosorbit_nav_v1.bsp, near_eroslanded_nav_v1.bsp, NEAR SPICE archive (its last half hour eased onto the shape model: it ends 194 m inside it)NEAR NAV team (JPL); NASA/JHU-APLpublic (NASA)
The landingVeverka, J. et al. (2001), Nature 413:390
Perseverance's and Curiosity's entry, descent and landingm2020_edl_v01.bsp, msl_edl_v01.bsp (200 Hz reconstructions; raised 2.23 and 4.92 km to end on the smooth globe), Mars 2020 and MSL SPICE archivesNASA/JPL-Caltech EDL teamspublic (NASA)
Cassini's plunge into Saturn, 15 Sep 2017200128RU_SCPSE_17235_17258.bsp (reconstructed), NAIF Cassini archive; the film's shot 12 uses the sameNASA/JPL-Caltechpublic (NASA)
Huygens' entry and descent at Titan, 14 Jan 2005DTWG#5 trajectory tables (HUY_DTWG_ENTRY.TAB, HUY_DTWG_DESCENT_POS.TAB, HP-SSA-DTWG-6-TRAJECTORY-V2.0), ESA Planetary Science Archive; Cassini from 050214R_SCPSE_04336_05015.bsp (NAIF)Huygens DTWG, B. Kazeminejad (ESA-ESTEC); Kazeminejad, B. et al. (2007), Planet. Space Sci. 55:1845CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO (ESA archive terms); Cassini public

Rovers' drives: Curiosity, Perseverance and Ingenuity from NASA/JPL-Caltech's MMGIS traverse maps; Spirit and Opportunity from the PDS Geosciences Node MER Analyst's Notebook (NASA/JPL-Caltech/Washington University); Sojourner from the PDS rover uplink logs (NASA); Zhurong from Ding et al. 2022 (Nature Geoscience) and the RoPeR camera labels (figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.29946872, CC BY 4.0, CNSA/GRAS); Yutu-2 from the Chang'e-4 radar data (Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.10154147, CC BY 4.0, CNSA/GRAS); Yutu from Planmap D6.2 (Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.4055234, CC BY 4.0) after Xiao et al. 2015.

Flybys, arrivals, entries and an impact (42 encounters at 27 bodies, each closest approach checked against the published figure): trajectories from NASA JPL Horizons (ssd.jpl.nasa.gov; Solar System Dynamics Group), except Rosetta at Steins and Lutetia from ESA's own kernels (ESA SPICE Service) and Galileo at Gaspra and Ida from the PDS one-minute trajectory tables (GO-A-POS-6-GASPRA/IDA-FLYBY-TRAJ-V1.0, NASA PDS PPI), and Hayabusa2's arrival at Ryugu from JAXA's home-position kernel (ISAS/JAXA). Turned into each body's frame with the Explorer's own rotation models. Artemis I and II whole and at the Moon: NASA/JSC navigation's trajectories in Horizons (Artemis I -1023, Post_TLI_Orion_AsFlown_20221213; Artemis II -1024, rev. 20 Apr 2026), checked against NASA's Artemis I blog (the outbound and return powered flybys, 81 and 80.6 miles up) and NASA's Artemis II pages (6,545 km over the Moon; the distance record); the timelines' marks from Horizons' headers and NASA's mission blogs. Both missions also in legs (Artemis I in five, Artemis II in four), joined where NASA said Orion crossed the Moon's sphere of influence (the Artemis I blog's flight days 5, 8, 18 and 21; Artemis II's from Horizons' header), checked against NASA's figures: the outbound flyby 130.4 km up at 12:57:37 UTC (NASA: 81 miles, 6:57 a.m. CST), the return flyby 129.5 km up at 16:43:58 (NASA: 80.6 miles, 10:43 a.m. CST), Artemis II 8,281.9 km from the Moon's centre at 23:00:46 (Horizons: 8,282 km at 23:01) and past Apollo 13's 400,171 km at 17:57 (NASA: 1:57 p.m. EDT). Hera past Mars and Deimos and at Didymos (Horizons -91: ESA's tracking, then its planned approach). The whole missions and Hera's arrival drawn fixed in space. CAPSTONE: its four-month ballistic lunar transfer and its first turns in the near-rectilinear halo orbit, from JPL Horizons -1176 (Advanced Space's orbit determination for NASA, tracked to 15 July 2026), checked against NASA's figures: farthest from Earth 1,538,000 km on 26 Aug 2022 (NASA: about 1.5 million km), the insertion at 00:39 UTC on 14 Nov 2022 (NASA: 7:39 p.m. EST), perilunes 1,630 to 1,760 km over the north pole and apolunes 70,400 to 71,600 km from the centre over the south (NASA: within 1,000 miles of one pole, 43,500 miles from the other). Gateway as designed (planned, never flown): NASA's reference 9:2 halo orbit, receding_horiz_3189_1burnApo_DiffCorr_15yr.bsp (D. E. Lee, NASA JSC; NAIF MORE_PROJECTS/DSG; Lee, D. E. (2019), White Paper: Gateway Destination Orbit Model, NASA NTRS 20190030294), with JPL's DE440 for the Moon; its status from NASA's Ignition fact sheet (24 Mar 2026). Planned sites near the Moon's south pole: NASA's nine Artemis candidate landing regions, traced from NASA's map (NASA, NASA Provides Update on Artemis III Moon Landing Regions, 28 Oct 2024; map NASA/GSFC/ASU/JSC/AGDT, public domain) and checked against the USGS Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature (IAU/USGS: the craters' centres); Moon Base I's target on the Shackleton connecting ridge (NASA, NASA Provides Update on Moon Base Rovers, Landers, Missions, 26 May 2026), placed on the ridge's highest ground in NASA's LOLA 20 m DEM (Barker et al. 2023) from LROC's junction with Shackleton's rim (Robinson, M., LROC, Traversing the Shackleton de Gerlache Ridge, 2022). Artemis III (planned): NASA's Artemis III mission page and the Planetary Society's account of its crew (June 2026). The film's supply run to Shackleton Base (fiction): flown by our own guidance over a point-mass Moon (DE440's GM) to the base's place on the LOLA 20 m DEM (Barker et al. 2023), the Sun from DE440. The comets and small bodies added 2026-10-22, each closest approach checked against the published figure: Deep Impact's impactor and flyby craft at Tempel 1 (di_finalenc_nav_v3, NASA PDS NAIF DI-C-SPICE-6-V1.0; A'Hearn, M. F. et al. 2005, Science 310:258), Stardust-NExT at Tempel 1 and Stardust at Wild 2 (sdu_l_2011_t1 and sdu_w2_opnav, NAIF SDU-C-SPICE-6-V1.0; Veverka, J. et al. 2013, Icarus 222:424; Brownlee, D. E. et al. 2004, Science 304:1764), EPOXI at Hartley 2 (dif_dixi_nav_v1, NAIF DIF-C/E/X-SPICE-6-V1.0; A'Hearn, M. F. et al. 2011, Science 332:1396), Deep Space 1 at Borrelly (ds1_opnav_borrelly, NAIF DS1-A/C-SPICE-6-V1.0; Soderblom, L. A. et al. 2002, Science 296:1087), Giotto at Halley (giotto_19860305_19860317, NAIF from ESOC's ephemeris, ESA SPICE Service; Reinhard, R. 1986, Nature 321:313), and from JPL Horizons Stardust at Annefrank (Duxbury et al. 2004), NEAR Shoemaker at Mathilde (Veverka, J. et al. 1997, Science 278:2109) and Lucy at Dinkinesh and Donaldjohanson (Levison et al. 2024; NASA).

Mariner 4 at Mars, 15 July 1965 (not in JPL Horizons): the areocentric hyperbola JPL fitted to the encounter tracking, JPL Technical Report 32-881, Mariner Mars 1964 Project Report: Mission Operations (1966), Table 4 (its misprinted a and e corrected from its own periapsis), drawn as a two-body conic about Mars with GM and the Sun from JPL DE440; checked against JPL's Mariner Mars 1964 Bulletin No. 52 (4 August 1965: each picture's time, range, centre and Sun angle), the occultation's entry and exit in TR 32-881 and in Kliore, A. et al., *Mariner IV Occultation Experiment* (JPL TR 32-984, 1966) and Science 149:1243 (1965), and the closest approach in NASA's PIA14032 caption; 1965 UTC from the USNO's TAI-UTC table. Mariner 2 at Venus, 14 December 1962: NASA JPL Horizons (target -2), John Anderson's 2012 fit to the encounter Doppler printed in JPL TR 32-816 (1967), as NAIF's notes on m2_620827_621231_ja_v1 say; the closest approach usually quoted (NSSDCA, 34,773 km at 19:59:28 UT) is the 1962 navigation's, 123 km lower and 4 min 44 s later than this path. NASA documents and data, public.

Apollo 11's whole trip in eight legs: MSFC, Saturn V Launch Vehicle Flight Evaluation Report AS-506 (MPR-SAT-FE-69-9, 1969); Northrop for NASA MSFC, AS-506 Post-Launch Operational Trajectory (NASA CR-61291, 1969); NASA MSC, Apollo 11 Mission Report (MSC-00171, 1971); F. V. Bennett, Apollo Lunar Descent and Ascent Trajectories (NASA TM X-58040, 1970); the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal (E. M. Jones) for the landing's callouts; the Apollo Flight Journal's copy of the post-launch report; LROC for Tranquility Base; JPL DE440 for the coasts' gravity. NASA documents, public.

Its hardware by stage on the follow camera: the gallery's Saturn V, LM, CSM and command module, the stack changing at the flight evaluation report's staging times (S-IC/S-II separation 162.3 s, S-II aft interstage 192.3 s, escape tower 197.9 s, S-II/S-IVB separation 549.0 s; Tables 4-1 to 4-3) and the Mission Report's (CSM separation 3:17:04.6, docking 3:24:03.1, LM extraction 4:16:59.1, CM/SM separation 194:49:12.7, drogues 195:12:06.9); the LM's landing gear folded until Aldrin's "Landing Gear Deploy, Fire" at 098:14:35 (the Apollo Flight Journal's onboard transcript); the drogue and main parachutes (our models, below) over the CM from the drogues' deployment and the nominal 10,000 ft. Adjusted: the LM's height in the adapter (its folded footpads just over the instrument unit) and the CSM 15 m from the LM while turning round are ours; the LM's probes are hidden while its gear is folded (the model's are folded flat, as landed); the attitudes are not the flown ones (the stack points along its motion, the CM's heat shield into it; the CM hangs upright under its parachutes, not at its hang angle).

The deep-space craft's whole journeys in the overview: NASA JPL Horizons (heliocentric vectors), with NASA's Voyager encounter trajectory files (NAIF) for the Voyagers' planetary flybys and ESA's reconstructed Rosetta cruise (ESA SPICE Service); the Voyagers' termination-shock and heliopause crossings as published. DART (JPL's final reconstruction, -135) to its impact on Dimorphos: Daly, R. T. et al. (2023), Nature 616:443, doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05810-5 (the impact); Thomas, C. A. et al. (2023), Nature 616:448, doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05805-2 (Dimorphos's orbit 33 ± 1 minutes shorter). Hera (-91: ESA's tracking, then its planned approach to Didymos): checked against ESA's Mars flyby (around 5000 km up) and Deimos (as close as 300 km) pages. The Deep Space Network's craft (2026-10-22), each from its flight team's trajectory in JPL Horizons: Psyche (JPL navigation), Europa Clipper (JPL navigation; NASA/JPL's Mars flyby, about 884 km up), Lucy (its navigation team's reference trajectory to 2033; NASA's Dinkinesh and Donaldjohanson flybys), Juice (ESA), Solar Orbiter (ESA), BepiColombo (ESA; ESA's Mercury flybys), Hayabusa2 (JAXA), STEREO-A (from 2022), ESCAPADE Blue and Gold (UC Berkeley SSL), MMX (JAXA), and the cruises to Mars of Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, MAVEN, Mars Odyssey (JPL navigation) and the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (ESA flight dynamics). Their orbits at Mars and LRO's at the Moon in each body's paths (tools/flybys.py, Horizons). The craft near Earth (SOHO, ACE, Wind, DSCOVR, IMAP, SWFO-L1, Carruthers, JWST, Roman, TESS, Chandra, XMM-Newton, MMS 1 to 4): Horizons vectors from Earth's centre, where the DSN layer's lines end.

Not played (no public trajectory to the ground): Hayabusa's touchdowns on Itokawa (2005; no kernel covers the second, the first is meaningless below 20 m), Hayabusa2's touchdowns on Ryugu (2019; the final descents are not in the public archive).

The Library's spacecraft and stations

Real spacecraft in the gallery, each from its public model (NASA 3D Resources unless stated) or modelled by us, sized to published figures; what is adjusted or ours is noted in each fact sheet.

The Explorer's timeline

The Explorer's timeline marks these and other missions and sky events, each with its own source (NASA NSSDCA, the Apollo Flight and Lunar Surface Journals, NASA and NASA JPL mission pages, ESA, ISRO, the NASA Eclipse Web Site, the JPL Small-Body Database).

Eclipse comparisons

Software in the app

satellite.js (MIT), Shashwat Kandadai and contributors: SGP4 in the viewer's Live mode.

three-mesh-bvh (MIT), Garrett Johnson: fast raycasts against the shape models (67P and the other irregular bodies) in the viewer.

Lucide (ISC), Lucide Icons and Contributors, including icons from Feather (MIT), Cole Bemis: the viewer's everyday icons (play, zoom, help, layers and the like), redrawn to the viewer's square line. The space glyphs (planets, orbits, the light pulse, the terminator, map projection, the data badges) were drawn for the project.

three.js (MIT): the interactive viewer. Its KTX2 texture loader carries the Basis Universal transcoder, Binomial LLC (Apache-2.0), with ktx-parse and zstddec by Don McCurdy (MIT); the textures are encoded with Basis Universal's basisu (Apache-2.0). The models' geometry is packed with meshoptimizer's gltfpack and decoded by its decoder (MIT), Arseny Kapoulkine.

The film

The twelve moments, 1969 to 2400, and what is on screen in them. The film's end credits are this part, shortened: what each card says is marked here.

Solar Timeline

The past is drawn from the record; the future is our own design.

About the film

A film of the solar system from 1969 to 2400: what was really there on each date, and what might be there next.

Twelve moments: Earthrise from Apollo 11's command module Columbia, the first steps at Tranquility Base, Voyager 1 at Jupiter, a 1985 base on the rim of Shackleton crater, a 1995 landing in Coprates Chasma on Mars, sunrise over the International Space Station with Atlantis docked, Philae's landing on a comet, Cassini's last plunge into Saturn, and four journeys outward to Ceres, Io, Saturn's rings and Neptune.

A non-commercial film, with music written and played for it. Its code is open source under the MIT licence; the film, its music and its own designs are shared under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Accuracy card

The positions of the Sun, Earth, Moon and planets, the phases they show and the sunlight in every shot are computed for that shot's date from NASA JPL's DE440 planetary ephemeris. Planets, moons and the Sun are shown at their true sizes as seen from the camera. Sunlight falls with distance from the Sun as it does in space.

The terrain at Shackleton crater is NASA's laser-altimeter map of the lunar south pole, and the Sun there clears the real skyline.

Philae and Cassini fly their real reconstructed paths, from ESA's and NASA's SPICE kernels. Other spacecraft paths, the camera positions and all hardware after 2017 are designed for the film.

Where the film departs from the record, it does so on purpose. For example: shot 1 runs the orbit at twice real speed; shot 3 places Voyager by hand at its real distance; Ceres uses its mean distance; Earth in shot 10 is enlarged to stay visible and Neptune's rings are drawn brighter than true.

Where everything was

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Planet, Moon and Sun positions, 1550–2650NASA JPL DE440 ephemeris: Park, R. S., Folkner, W. M., Williams, J. G., Boggs, D. H. (2021), The JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE440 and DE441, Astronomical Journal 161:105NASA, public
Lunar orientation (surface sites)NASA NAIF SPICE kernels: moon_pa_de421_1900-2050.bpc, moon_080317.tf, pck00008.tpcNASA, public
Planet and moon rotation models (poles, Mars prime meridian)IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: Archinal, B. A. et al. (2011, 2018), Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomypublished
Radii and gravitational parametersNASA planetary fact sheets; IAU nominal valuesNASA, public

Shackleton's terrain and rocks

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Shackleton crater terrain and skyline (shot 4; the Explorer's Go there and Show here at the base, from the shot's ground)NASA LOLA south-pole DEM, 20 m/pixel (LDEM_80S_20MPP_ADJ): Barker, M. K., Mazarico, E., Neumann, G. A., Smith, D. E., Zuber, M. T., Head, J. W., Sun, X. (2023), A New View of the Lunar South Pole from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA), Planetary Science Journal 4:183, doi:10.3847/PSJ/acf3e1; data doi:10.60903/gsfcpgda-lola-spoleNASA, public
Rocks on the Shackleton rim (shot 4), by sizeGolombek, M. and Rapp, D. (1997), Size-frequency distributions of rocks on Mars and Earth analog sites, JGR 102(E2):4117; applied to the Moon by Li, B., Ling, Z., Zhang, J. and Chen, J. (2017), Rock size-frequency distributions analysis at lunar landing sites based on remote sensing and in-situ imagery, Planetary and Space Science; rock abundance from LRO Diviner: Bandfield, J. L. et al. (2011), JGR 116published

Lunar soil and small craters

WhatSourceLicence or terms
How lunar soil reflects sunlight with viewing angle (shots 2 and 4)McEwen, A. S. (1991), Photometric functions for photoclinometry and other applications, Icarus 92:298; the lunar phase curve approximated as exp(-0.016 a)published
Small craters (shot 4), by sizeGault, D. E. (1970), Saturation and equilibrium conditions for impact cratering on the lunar surface, Radio Science 5(2):273; Xiao, Z. and Werner, S. C. (2015), Size-frequency distribution of crater populations in equilibrium on the Moon, JGR Planets 120:2277published

The ground on Mars

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Rocks round the Mars landing site (shot 5)Golombek and Rapp (1997), as above; landing-site rock abundances from orbit: Nowicki, S. A. and Christensen, P. R. (2007), Rock abundance on Mars from the Thermal Emission Spectrometer, JGR 112, E05007published

Neptune's moons

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Triton and Nereid positions (shot 10)NASA JPL satellite ephemerides NEP097 (Triton, nep097xl-801.bsp) and NEP101 (Nereid, nep101xl-802.bsp), R. A. Jacobson / M. Brozović, via NAIF (naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/generic_kernels/spk/satellites/)NASA, public
Neptune's inner moons' orbits (shot 10)NASA JPL Solar System Dynamics, Planetary Satellite Mean Elements (ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sats/elem/), NEP097 Laplace-plane elements; positions along the orbits in 2400 are illustrativeNASA, public
Neptune's moons' sizes and albedos (shot 10)Karkoschka, E. (2003), Sizes, shapes, and albedos of the inner satellites of Neptune, Icarus 162:400; Showalter, M. R. et al. (2019), The seventh inner moon of Neptune, Nature 566:350 (Hippocamp); Thomas, P., Veverka, J., Helfenstein, P. (1991), Voyager observations of Nereid, JGR 96:19253published

Neptune's rings

WhatSourceLicence or terms
Neptune's rings: radii, widths, optical depths, dust fractions, arc reflectivity (shot 10)Porco, C. C. et al. (1995), Neptune's ring system, in Neptune and Triton (Univ. Arizona Press); de Pater, I., Renner, S., Showalter, M. R., Sicardy, B. (2018), The rings of Neptune, in Planetary Ring Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press), arXiv:1906.11728published
Adams ring arcs: which persist, mean motion, longitude (shot 10)Souami, D. et al. (2022), Neptune's ring arcs from VLT/SPHERE-IRDIS near-infrared observations, A&A 657:A134, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141598; Porco, C. C. (1991), An explanation for Neptune's ring arcs, Science 253:995published

Saturn's B ring up close

WhatSourceLicence or terms
The B ring's local structure: optical depth over 4 in its core (B3), a layer tens of metres thick (shot 9)Colwell, J. E. et al. (2009), The structure of Saturn's rings, in Saturn from Cassini-Huygens (Springer), 375; Tiscareno, M. S. and Murray, C. D., eds. (2018), Planetary Ring Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press)published
Particle sizes, about 1 cm to 5 m on n(a) ~ a^-3 (shot 9)Zebker, H. A., Marouf, E. A., Tyler, G. L. (1985), Saturn's rings: particle size distributions for thin layer models, Icarus 64:531; French, R. G. and Nicholson, P. D. (2000), Saturn's rings II. Particle sizes inferred from stellar occultation data, Icarus 145:502published
Self-gravity wakes: trailing about 20 degrees, spaced at the Toomre wavelength (shot 9)Toomre, A. (1964), ApJ 139:1217; Salo, H. (1992), Gravitational wakes in Saturn's rings, Nature 359:619; Colwell, J. E., Esposito, L. W., Sremcevic, M. (2006), GRL 33:L07201; Hedman, M. M. et al. (2007), AJ 133:2624; Colwell, J. E. et al. (2007), Self-gravity wakes and radial structure of Saturn's B ring, Icarus 190:127published
The B ring's surface density, 400-1,400 kg/m^2 (the wake spacing, shot 9)Hedman, M. M. and Nicholson, P. D. (2016), The B-ring's surface mass density from hidden density waves: less than meets the eye?, Icarus 279:109published
How the ring layer reflects: Lambert-sphere phase function, Lommel-Seeliger law, shadowing within the layer (shot 9)Chandrasekhar, S. (1960), Radiative Transfer (Dover); Cuzzi, J. N. et al. (1984), Saturn's rings: properties and processes, in Planetary Rings (Univ. Arizona Press); the film keeps Lambert spheres although real particles scatter more backwards (Dones, L., Cuzzi, J. N., Showalter, M. R. (1993), Icarus 105:184)published

Events and references

ShotEventReference
OpeningThe epigraph, “Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us.”Sagan, C. (1994), Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space, Random House
1–2Apollo 11: lunar orbit insertion 19 July 1969; first EVA 21 July 1969NASA
3Voyager 1 closest approach to Jupiter, 5 March 1979, 349,000 km from the centreNASA JPL
6STS-135, the last Space Shuttle mission: Atlantis docked to the ISS on PMA-2 at Harmony's forward port from 10 to 19 July 2011, Raffaello berthed on Harmony's nadir port from 11 to 18 July; the spacewalk of 12 July (Mike Fossum and Ron Garan) loaded the failed pump module into the bayNASA, STS-135 Space Shuttle Mission Report (JSC-37461, 2011)
10The Pale Blue Dot, Voyager 1, 14 February 1990NASA JPL
10Voyager 2's backlit views of Neptune's rings, 26 August 1989 (591-second exposures at 135 degrees phase, PIA01997)NASA JPL

The film's look draws on For All Mankind (Sony Pictures Television / Apple TV+) and The Expanse (Alcon Entertainment / Amazon). No designs, footage or names from either are used.

Software

Blender 5.2, Blender Foundation (GPL): every scene modelled, lit and rendered, in Cycles and Eevee.

Flamenco 3.9, Blender Studio (GPL): the render farm.

MPFB 2, Joel Palmius and the MakeHuman Community (GPL): the crew's bodies.

Skyfield, by Brandon Rhodes (MIT), and SpiceyPy, NASA NAIF's SPICE toolkit for Python (MIT): where the Sun, planets, moons and spacecraft were.

rasterio and GDAL (BSD, MIT): the lunar terrain.

NumPy (BSD), Pillow (HPND) and FFmpeg (LGPL/GPL): grading, titles and the cut.

Open source and open data

All the software above is free and open source, under the licences given. The data and models come from free public archives: NASA (JPL, NAIF, the Planetary Data System, 3D Resources), USGS Astrogeology and ESA, mostly in the public domain, with credit owed where marked; Solar System Scope maps are CC BY 4.0; the Smithsonian's scan of Armstrong's spacesuit is used under its non-commercial terms; ESA's archive data (the comet's shape, Gaia's stars) are CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO. No endorsement by NASA, ESA, JAXA, the Smithsonian or any other source is implied. The computers ran Apple's macOS, which is not open source. AI was used to build and manage the render farm and to develop the software; it is a commercial service, not open source.

Maps of the Moon and Earth

BodyMapCreditLicence
Moon foreground, shot 1LROC WAC empirically normalised reflectance mosaic, 643 nm, 100–200 m; SLDEM2015 relief, 59 m: Barker, M. K. et al. (2016), Icarus 273:346 (PDS)NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University; NASA/GSFC LOLA team; JAXA SELENE Terrain Camerapublic domain
Moon colourLROC WAC colour, CGI Moon Kit (2025)NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio; LROC WAC data NASA/GSFC/Arizona State Universitypublic domain
Moon reliefLOLA 16 ppd, CGI Moon KitNASA's Scientific Visualization Studio; LOLA data NASA/GSFCpublic domain
Earth dayBlue Marble Next Generation, JulyNASA Earth Observatory, Reto Stöckli (MODIS)public domain
Earth nightBlack Marble 2016NASA Earth Observatory, Joshua Stevens; Suomi NPP VIIRS data, Miguel Román, NASA GSFCpublic domain
Earth cloudsBlue Marble cloudsNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Reto Stöckli (MODIS)public domain
Earth below the ISS, shot 6Blue Marble Next Generation, July 2004, 500 m tiles D1 and D2NASA Earth Observatory, Reto Stöckli (MODIS)public domain
City lights below the ISS, shot 6Black Marble 2016, 500 m tiles D1 and D2 (the dim base taken out)NASA Earth Observatory, Joshua Stevens; Suomi NPP VIIRS data, Miguel Román, NASA GSFCpublic domain
Clouds below the ISS, shot 6MODIS Corrected Reflectance (true colour), Aqua and Terra, 16 July 2011, 250 m, via NASA Worldview / GIBSNASA Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS); MODIS Land Rapid Response team, NASA GSFCpublic domain

Maps of the planets, moons and stars

BodyMapCreditLicence
JupiterPIA07782 global mapNASA/JPL/Space Science Institutepublic domain
IoGalileo / Voyager colour mosaicNASA/JPL/USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
EuropaVoyager / Galileo SSI global mosaic, 500 mNASA/JPL/USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
GanymedeVoyager / Galileo SSI colour global mosaic, 1.4 kmNASA/JPL/USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
CallistoVoyager / Galileo SSI global mosaic, 1 kmNASA/JPL/USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Saturn, Saturn's rings, NeptuneSolar System Scope textures, adapted (resized, mapped to the globes)Solar System Scope (solarsystemscope.com/textures), CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)CC BY 4.0, attribution required
Enceladus (shot 12)Cassini ISS global mosaic, 100 m, high-pass filtered: Bland, M. T. et al. (2018), Earth and Space Science 5:604NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
Tethys (shot 12)Cassini global mosaic, 293 mNASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute; USGS Astrogeology Science Centerpublic domain
TritonVoyager 2 global mosaicNASA/JPL/USGS; mosaic by Paul Schenk (LPI)public domain
CeresDawn HAMO global mosaicNASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDApublic domain
StarsDeep Star Maps 2020NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio; Gaia DR2: ESA/Gaia/DPACpublic domain (NASA); Gaia data CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO, Gaia credit required

The Moon maps and the star map are from Internet Archive copies of the NASA SVS files; their sizes match the SVS listings.

Our own designs

Apollo and Voyager

The ISS and Atlantis

Comet 67P and Philae's path

Philae's landing

Cassini's Grand Finale

Rendered on

A home render farm of two Apple computers running Flamenco: a MacBook Pro (Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB), which also ran the farm, and a Mac mini (Apple M4 Pro, 24 GB), six render workers between them, on their GPUs through Metal.

Geological-unit maps of Jupiter's moons

The Explorer rasterises the USGS GIS unit polygons into streamed maps. Unmapped areas are grey; structural lines and point symbols from the printed maps are not included. Io and Ganymede use labelled app colours. Europa uses the GIS palette and unit names from its pamphlet.

BodySourceTerms
IoWilliams, D. A. et al. (2012), USGS SIM 3168U.S. public domain
GanymedeCollins, G. C. et al. (2013; posted 2014), USGS SIM 3237U.S. public domain
EuropaLeonard, E. J., Patthoff, D. A. and Senske, D. A. (2024), USGS SIM 3513U.S. public domain

Phobos retains Gaskell's older body coordinates. Deimos retains the historical Thomas frame, with west longitude converted to east and about 400 m source uncertainty over much of longitude 200–355 degrees. Their placement in the current rotation is nominal; the maps are not precision-registered to the shapes.

Argonaut illustrative CAD (local review)

ESA and Thales Alenia Space: Argonaut programme and CAD download, Argonaut_TASI_Newlander_01.stl, retrieved 23 October 2026. ESA generated the passenger; the descent element is inspired by Thales Alenia Space's concept. The page offers the model for illustration and asks for these credits. Converted-mesh redistribution is not explicitly granted; public_ok: false keeps the model out of public builds pending clarification under ESA's website terms. Local preparation reduces 1,770,870 triangles to approximately 240,000, centres the terrain base at zero height and adds a neutral grey review material. STL supplies neither materials nor articulated parts. Units are unspecified: source scale is retained provisionally, without equating this concept's 13.21 × 13.18 × 9.37 scene envelope (terrain base, astronaut and mast included) to the newer published flight design. Mission target: 2030, Ariane 64, lunar south polar region; no precise landing site, date or flight path is invented.

Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope model

NASA Goddard / Conceptual Image Lab: textured deployed illustration, RST_Model_V004.glb, from the Roman commissioning page. Used under NASA media guidelines, with no endorsement implied. Adapted by centring, uniformly scaling to NASA’s approximate 12.7 m overall length, naming components and retaining source textures and geometry. This is illustrative geometry, not flight CAD: its scaled mirror is 2.12 m versus the real 2.4 m primary. Original source SHA-256: a873fc95945ed0992c552c2a97fc6c5cd0bf7f5519df0040d5a299b03bae67ce. The web copy omits two unusable normal/occlusion map references on the black insulation: the exported mesh has no UV coordinates. Its colour, metalness, roughness and geometry are retained.

Friendship 7 and DSN observatory paths

Friendship 7: NASA Manned Spacecraft Center, *First United States Manned Three-Pass Orbital Mission*, NASA TM X-563-1 (1964), Table XXI, actual post-posigrade state (public report copy). Positions are our numerical integration with central Earth gravity and J2, not recovered telemetry. Atmospheric drag, higher harmonics, solar/lunar gravity and control impulses are omitted. Starts after separation rockets and stops before retrofire; no launch or entry trajectory is invented. Timing: NASA’s 1962 flight results, Table 6-II. The fireflies milestone uses David G. Simpson’s NASA case study; its educational orbital elements are not used. Capsule attitude is illustrative.

MMS 1–4 and XMM-Newton: NASA/JPL Horizons Earth-centred ICRF vectors, queried at 30-second intervals for the dated tours. Four independent MMS trajectories share the family model. These are dated paths, distinct from the live DSN feed; model attitude is not flight telemetry.

Library orbit coverage

SOHO, ACE, Wind, DSCOVR, IMAP, Carruthers, Roman, TESS, Chandra, Mars Express, Hope, Danuri, Chandrayaan-2, ARTEMIS-P1/P2 (THEMIS-B/C), Kepler and Spitzer: NASA/JPL Horizons geometric ICRF vectors. Target identifiers, dates and sample intervals are in tools/flybys.py (LIBRARY_ORBITS); raw responses are cached under data/horizons_flybys. These are dated trajectory solutions, potentially combining reconstructed and predicted segments, not live telemetry. The L1 paths are shown relative to Earth; Roman's span includes its transfer towards L2. Kepler and Spitzer are shown relative to the Sun during their operating missions. Attitudes are illustrative.

Drive ship at Ceres and ice hauler at Saturn: our original fictional demonstrations in tools/fictional_orbits.py, two circular coasting orbits each. Gravitational parameters come from JPL's DE440 GM kernel; solar lighting comes from Horizons. Point-mass gravity only, with no burns, docking, stationkeeping, ring-particle avoidance or third-body perturbations. They are fictional examples, not engineering feasibility claims or agency plans.

Satellite catalogue enrichment

Readable catalogue owner/source and launch-site names use CelesTrak’s SATCAT owner/source dictionary and launch-site dictionary, retrieved 24 October 2026. These describe catalogue codes, not necessarily the current operating company. The shared snapshot is assets/satellite-info.json; unknown codes remain visible. Mission descriptions are original short summaries of the NASA mission pages linked on each entry (Terra, Aqua, Aura, Landsat 8/9, Swift and IXPE). They describe mission purpose, not current operational status.

Terra and Aqua Earth-observation models (25 October 2026)

Jezero landing-area detail (Explorer, 2026-10-25)

NASA/JPL/USGS HiRISE Mars 2020 terrain-relative-navigation orthomosaic, Fergason, R. L., Galuszka, D. M., Hare, T. M., Mayer, D. P., and Redding, B. L. (2020), DOI 10.5066/P9QJDP48. USGS data release marks it CC0 1.0. The JPL surface-operations derivative is JEZ_hirise_soc_007_orthoMosaic_25cm_Ortho_blend120.tif, from the USGS S3 distribution.

tools/mars_deep.py reads a 1.2 km window centred on 18.4446°N, 77.4509°E, transforms its orthographic Mars-sphere coordinates to the Explorer's planetocentric map, and builds sparse tiles down to about 0.6 m/pixel. The source is 0.25 m/pixel. The imagery stays greyscale, with the original image's lighting baked in. Edges blend into the globe. This first patch does not displace terrain and is not a claim of wheel-level registration or coverage of the entire traverse.

The landing-area relief now uses the matching 1 m HiRISE DEM: JEZ_hirise_soc_006_DTM_MOLAtopography_DeltaGeoid_1m_Eqc_latTs0_lon0_blend40.tif from the same USGS S3 distribution. Fergason et al. (2020), 10.5066/P9REJ9JN, USGS data release, CC0. tools/mars_deep.py --fetch-dem reads a bounded 1.3 km source window. A 257-square grid samples this at approximately 5 m spacing, with centimetre quantisation and a smooth taper to zero at the patch boundary. Height at the landing point is subtracted: **relative relief anchored to the reference ellipsoid**, not an absolute areoid-to-ellipsoid conversion. The source datum and subtracted height remain in surface.json. Ground mesh, rover placement, rover tilt and camera clearance use that same grid. Model wheels and suspension are rigid; this is not a reconstruction of measured wheel contacts or attitude.

The local regional extension (tools/mars_regions.py) adds a second window centred on the recorded 2 July 2021 traverse position (18.4360984 N, 77.4517056 E), using those same image/DEM releases and CC0 terms. Both DEM windows use the original landing reference height, not independent local zeroes. Fine samples share a 5 m cylindrical lattice (east-west ground spacing varies with latitude), with centimetre quantisation. The union coverage fades at its outer edge; overlapping regions do not independently fade towards zero. A bounded coarse field backs the fine fields, with smooth residual blending at their edges. The current two-region set is loaded before scene creation; mesh, rover/path placement and camera clearance share that fixed snapshot. This extends early-traverse coverage only, not the whole route. Original image lighting remains baked in; wheels and suspension remain rigid.

Apollo LRV engineering greybox (review only, 2026-10-25)

tools/assets/apollo_lrv_greybox.py is original geometry built from published envelope dimensions in NASA NSSDCA, The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle: frame length 3.1 m, wheelbase 2.3 m, tyre diameter 0.818 m, tyre width 0.23 m, and loaded ground clearance 0.36 m. The greybox's track width, folding axes, seat and equipment shapes, antenna, suspension struts and guards are provisional layout, not dimensioned flight-hardware reconstructions. No third-party model, texture or Don McMillan imagery was incorporated. It is not in the Library, mission paths or film. The Boeing LRV Operations Handbook is the next engineering reference for correcting those provisional assemblies.

Shuttle launch-part review imports (2026-10-25)

NASA/Johnson Space Center, Space Shuttle Parts: External tank.glb and Solid Rocket Booster.glb, used under the same NASA Image and Media Usage Guidelines as the project's other Shuttle parts; source credit retained, no implied endorsement. shuttle_launch_parts_review.py preserves source geometry and textures, provisionally converts inches to metres, turns the long axis upright and centres the base for inspection. Scale and mission configuration are not validated; these are review assets, not in the Library or film. Source checksums and cross-section reports are emitted with the review builds. See reports/Shuttle launch asset audit.md for discrepancies and required work before use.

Perseverance science stops (Explorer, 2026-10-25)

assets/drive_stories.json holds original summaries and links to NASA's first-road-trip map, Roubion assessment and sample catalogue. The July 2 view is an illustrative stop on the recorded early campaign route. August 6 and September 6 are date-level sampling/sealing context, not exact operation timestamps. Navigation chooses noon UTC on each date and interpolates the existing MMGIS traverse; it does not simulate drilling. The on-screen notes state this and link directly to the sources. Roubion is described as an unsuccessful rock core with an atmospheric sample, not a successful rock sample. No source images or audio were added by this feature. High-resolution terrain remains restricted to the existing two Jezero windows.

Historical mission audio candidates (review only, 2026-10-25)

NASA Historical Sounds, under its linked Images and Media Usage Guidelines: STS-135 Countdown to Launch, STS-135 Launch Commentary, and Mercury 6 Zero G. Exact download URLs and SHA-256 values are in assets/archive_audio.json. NASA is the credited source; no endorsement is implied. These are edited archive excerpts, not continuous mission loops. The unmodified MP3s are cached for review; temporary mono PCM is used only for local machine transcription. Draft transcripts are unverified and are not published or used as captions. No clips from this candidate set have been added to viewer playback yet.

Juice's August 2024 lunar–Earth gravity-assist paths use geometric ICRF vectors from NASA/JPL Horizons (spacecraft −28), sampled at 2 seconds near closest approach and 60 seconds farther out. The existing Juice model is reused. Encounter validation uses ESA's flown cruise report, ops v470, 14 April 2026, not the earlier trajectory-assessment planning table. Context: ESA's 21 August 2024 flyby report. The viewer's radial height above its ellipsoid differs slightly from ESA's reported altitude; the measured differences are 0.4 km at the Moon and 0.2 km at Earth, with closest-approach times within one second. Attitude and Director cameras are illustrative; the two encounter windows omit the intervening coast.

Europa Clipper's Mars encounter preparation uses NASA/JPL Horizons (-159), geometric ICRF positions relative to Mars, for an eight-hour window on 1 March 2025. Samples are 2 s near encounter and 60 s farther out. The 25 February NASA/JPL overview gives rounded pre-flyby comparison figures (17:57 UTC, 884 km), not exact reconstructed states. Horizons yields 17:56:54.0 UTC and 885.5 km radial height over the viewer's Mars ellipsoid; it is not forced to match those publicity figures. The displayed 11.16 km/s is Mars-relative, whereas NASA's 24.5 km/s approach figure is heliocentric. The cached Horizons object summary identifies JPL navigation solution cruise006-final-OD055 across this encounter. The post-flyby infrared report and radar report support the instrument-test context. No exact instrument-operation timeline or measured spacecraft attitude is claimed; the existing model is reused.

The Apollo canopy deployment greybox (tools/assets/apollo_canopy_deployment_review.py) reuses the main-canopy dimensions documented by the existing Apollo parachute builder from NASA TN D-7437, Figure A-15. Its 15% and 40% mouth fractions, restricted canopy bulge and profile interpolation are authored illustrations, not measured reefing ratios or a cloth simulation. Authored meridians preserve constructed length. An adaptive 11-pose bake limits sampled intermediate cloth and suspension shortening to 1 cm (seven checks per interval; independent regression at 31 weights per interval), rather than claiming exact preservation. It is an isolated single-canopy review asset. Its 68 suspension lines join the authored skirt at the published line length in each review pose. The 5 mm line radius and single convergence point are illustrative. Ringsail slots, risers, deployment bag, pilot and a mission deployment clock remain absent.

Landsat 8 original-source review: NASA / Christopher R. Meaney, LDCM-2014-composite.lwo from the official NASA-3D-Resources repository at commit 0ec49456c824c0d42049bdd62940a11a0a617731, path 3D Models/Landsat 8 (LDCM)/LDCM-2014-composite.lwo. SHA-256 d728dce6963b0e6a126576d5786386c4806b550b214e2183f8b638872dec71a7. The NASA model page credits the author and links the official repository. Our pinned, single-layer LWO2 review importer reads original polygons and flat surface colours, exchanges Y/Z axes and reverses winding, applies the same provisional scale as the published GLB node, and records Blender mesh validation. Procedural LightWave materials are not reproduced; the model remains an unassembled review asset.

Curiosity's day-level Director science stops use NASA's First Sample Drilling for John Klein on 8 February 2013, and Farewell to Murray Buttes, Image 2 for the 8 September 2016 view and the interpretation of cross-bedded sandstone as deposits from migrating dunes. Stop coordinates remain interpolated from the existing recorded traverse. Neither local outcrop geometry nor drilling operation timing is reconstructed by these stops. No source photographs are reproduced as new textures.

Curiosity — John Klein ground imagery

A bounded 300 m patch uses Calef, F. J. III and Parker, T. (2016), Gale merged orthophoto mosaic, 25 cm, NASA/JPL-Caltech/USGS/University of Arizona. USGS-produced data are public domain; attribution retained. The source is MSL_Gale_Orthophoto_Mosaic_25cm_v3.tif. tools/gale_deep.py reads a bounded window from the strip-organised source, checks its registration, coverage and checksum, then builds sparse map tiles. The centre is interpolated from Curiosity's recorded route at the day-level John Klein science stop. Greyscale lighting is baked into the photograph; there is no local height field or reconstructed drilling/outcrop geometry. This does not provide detailed imagery for the entire traverse.

New Glenn launch-vehicle greybox (review only)

Original geometry in tools/assets/new_glenn_review.py, informed by Blue Origin's New Glenn overview and NG-2 mission account, checked 25 October 2026. The nominal 98 m envelope, 7 m fairing, seven BE-4s, two BE-3Us, four control fins and six landing legs constrain this review of the seven-engine vehicle, not the separately advertised 9x4 variant. The body's 7 m diameter, individual stage lengths, fairing curve, engine geometry and arrangement, strake outlines, hinge locations and deployment travel are provisional modelling choices. No logos or downloaded source mesh are used. The Blue Origin photograph newglenn_giant-among-rockets.jpg was consulted privately for visual reference; it is not redistributed in the asset. This is not an NG-2 flight reconstruction, a verified launch stack or a timed path.

The LRV review wheels now use original sparse wire geometry, simplified chevrons and an internal bump-stop ring. NASA NSSDCA's same LRV reference gives 0.083 cm steel-strand diameter and 64.8 cm bump-stop diameter; these dimensions are used directly. The 64 strands per diagonal family, twenty chevrons, chevron sweep, rim sections and spokes are representation choices, not verified flight counts or construction. The wheel shape is rigid, with no load deflection.

Gale colour and elevation preparation (staged only)

The same USGS Gale orthophoto catalogue now offers the July 2025 colour product by Timothy Parker and Fred J. Calef III, MSL_Gale_HiRISE-LRGB_78quads_sharp_cog.tif. Its colour strips were registered to the greyscale mosaic and sharpened by the publishers. Bounded crops for both Curiosity science stops are staged separately; original lighting and published processing remain baked into the pixels. Credit NASA/JPL-Caltech, USGS and University of Arizona; catalogue use constraints: none, credit authors.

tools/gale_relief.py stages matching windows from USGS Gale merged DEM v3, Parker and Calef, 2016, MSL_Gale_DEM_Mosaic_1m_v3.tif. This merges multiple instruments tied to MOLA. One-metre grid spacing is not one-metre registration accuracy. Source elevations require an explicit local datum and seam/alignment checks before use on the viewer ellipsoid. No terrain activation is implied.

The isolated Gale terrain review models use those same registered colour and DEM windows. tools/assets/gale_relief_review.py samples a 129-square mesh at about 2.34 m spacing, keeps source registration, and subtracts each crop's centre elevation for a local review frame. Original image lighting remains baked; review lighting adds shading. The two local datums are not interchangeable and these meshes are not yet active Explorer terrain.

The animated single-canopy review now includes TN D-7437's 78-inch steel, 15.5-inch fabric and 42-inch connector axial lengths. Its six steel cables use the published 0.28-inch diameter. Cable spacing, connector envelope and fabric cross-section remain provisional geometry; no deployment mechanics are claimed.

Apollo 15 surface preparation (tools/apollo15_surface.py, staged only): NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University LROC NAC Apollo 15 DTM, NAC_DTM_APOLLO15.TIF (2 m posts), registered NAC_DTM_APOLLO15_M111578606_50CM.TIF imagery (0.5 m), and NAC_DTM_APOLLO15_CONF.IMG, directly from the LROC PDS archive LRO-L-LROC-5-RDR-V1.0/LROLRC_2001. Public-domain PDS products under the LROC terms; credit NASA/GSFC/ASU. The product readme reports 1.06 m relative precision and 1.74 m LOLA RMS; these are not claims of wheel-scale registration. Original image lighting remains baked. Crops use the published LROC Apollo 15 landing coordinate, 26.13239° N, 3.63330° E, from its temporal traverse. This replaces the rounded site definition, about 23 m away; the visible LM now lies at the crop centre. Pixel size does not imply placement accuracy. Confidence values in the fetched v1.9 product exceed the published readme's category lookup; the crop is preserved as uninterpreted, not a validity mask. No terrain or imagery activation is claimed.

Landsat 8 model preparation now uses that pinned original LightWave source through tools/assets/real_landsat8.py. Comparison with NASA's published model preview confirms the source layout; the earlier separated-hardware concern was not grounds for reassembly. No components were repositioned relative to one another. The source panel measures 9.774 m, within 0.3% of the nominal 32 ft (9.7536 m) in NASA SVS 11490. The source spacecraft axis is rotated from +X to Blender +Z. Degenerate triangles are removed; flat source colours remain, without recreating LightWave procedural materials. Credit NASA / Christopher R. Meaney. The model represents Landsat 8 only, in a static illustrative pose.

Chandrayaan-3 coverage preparation (tools/chandrayaan3_coverage.py): NASA/JPL Horizons targets -158 (lander) and -169 (propulsion module), Moon-centred ICRF vectors, archived ISRO/JPLNAV solutions. Raw queries and responses remain in data/horizons_flybys/ch3_review_*. Availability includes predicted continuation and does not establish flown landing accuracy. The diagnostic uses the viewer's IAU Moon rotation, not a high-precision frame fit. ISRO's mission details and LVM3-M4 brochure provide hardware specifications and reference views for future original models; no ISRO artwork or mesh is redistributed by this preparation.

Pragyan's original greybox (tools/assets/pragyan_greybox.py) uses ISRO's Chandrayaan-3 specifications and labelled rover views and the LVM3-M4 brochure, page 6 for the published 917 × 750 × 397 mm envelope and mechanism identification. Geometry and plain review materials are authored here; no reference artwork, logos or downloaded mesh are embedded. Proportions, wheel/tread geometry, rocker-bogie links and the folded-envelope interpretation remain provisional. The two panel poses are review states, not measured deployment timing.

Pragyan's wheelbase and staged surface landmarks: Kannan V. Iyer, Medha S. Alurkar, Ajay Kumar Prashar, K. Suresh and Amitabh (ISRO Space Applications Centre), Path tracing of the Chandrayaan-3 Rover from OHRC images, Current Science 128(6), 558–561 (2025), DOI 10.18520/cs/v128/i6/558-561. Figures 4/5 give 680 mm wheel-centre spacing front to rear and 750 mm across outer wheel faces. Table 2 supplies eight inferred turn locations, stored as factual coordinates in assets/pragyan-stops.json. No article figures, text passages or OHRC imagery are redistributed. The table does not supply event times or the complete traverse; no continuous measured drive is claimed.

Gale neighbourhood preparation (tools/gale_neighbourhood.py) uses the same USGS Gale merged DEM v3 as the registered relief reviews. Coarse fields sample that 1 m source at 18.75 m projected spacing around John Klein and Murray Buttes; detailed centres retain the reviewed crop. Each field is independently anchored at its science-stop centre, with a feather to the viewer reference ellipsoid at the outer edge. They are relative-relief preparations, not absolute areoid heights or an obstacle envelope. No new imagery licence or provider is introduced.

Pragyan APXS review mechanism: the Physical Research Laboratory's APXS instrument description and hardware photographs identify the six source apertures, central silicon drift detector, fixed four-metal calibration target and stowed/deployed configuration. PRL gives about 5–6 cm source/detector clearance during surface observation. Our original review geometry uses a 55 mm endpoint and a named deployment pivot; the housing size, pivot location, target shapes and motion between endpoints are proportional illustrations, not engineering dimensions or mission telemetry. No PRL photographs, graphics or logos are embedded or redistributed.

Pragyan APXS operation times: PRL's Observations with APXS and linked operation summary provide observation/mobility IDs, UTC start/end, exposure and availability. assets/pragyan-operations.json retains factual values and a source-image hash; no source table artwork is redistributed. tools/pragyan_operations.py joins matching mobility IDs to the separately credited Iyer et al. turn coordinates. Operation intervals include calibration overhead and cannot establish exact instrument deployment times, traversing speeds or the intervening route.

Apollo 15's source registration review (tools/assets/apollo15_relief_review.py) uses the PDS crops credited above through the same bounded mesh/UV builder as Gale. The 300 m patch is centred at the published LM coordinate and offsets source elevations by the centre sample; it does not treat PDS elevations as viewer ellipsoid heights. Its 2 m source posts and 0.5 m image pixels do not establish wheel-scale positioning. Confidence-map encoding remains unresolved; no quality-validated terrain or rover route is asserted. Source image shadows remain in the texture and review lighting adds shading.

SLIM orbital preparation (tools/slim_coverage.py): NASA/JPL Horizons target −240 metadata and vectors, post-launch JAXA trajectories, Moon-centred ICRF. The audit excludes documented defective intervals and does not use predicted descent as a flown landing. An additional discontinuity at 17 January 2024 00:00 is retained as a rejected review window. Coarse chord-speed screening is not a navigation-accuracy claim. JAXA's SLIM technology page links a GLB and the JAXA site policy; no source GLB is redistributed or optimised by this preparation.

SLIM orbital review (tools/slim_orbit_review.py) compares cached JPL Horizons positions with JAXA's 25 December 2023 lunar orbit insertion result and 15 January 2024 descent preparation update. JST milestone times are converted to UTC by subtracting nine hours. Plots are our own rendering of numerical ephemerides; no JAXA illustration or mesh is embedded. Heights use the canonical lunar mean sphere in tools/bodies.py, not local terrain. These are internal source reviews, not active film shots or app paths; source seams are retained and flagged, not smoothed away.

SLIM's original layout greybox (tools/assets/slim_greybox.py) uses the JAXA project dimensions (2.4 m height, 2.7 m width, 1.7 m depth) and the ISAS technology/component descriptions (two main engines, twelve attitude thrusters, five crushable contact absorbers, structural combined propellant tank). The labelled external-layout image was inspected privately as a reference; neither it nor the restricted downloadable GLB is embedded or redistributed. All mesh geometry and plain materials are original. Internal dimensions, equipment placement, cell-sheet outline and strut attachments are provisional proportions, not a measurement claim. The model has no flight-attitude animation, landing/crush simulation or LEV release operation. It remains outside the Library and shots pending review.

The selectable Gale terrain fields use the already-credited USGS merged 1 m Gale DEM (tools/gale_neighbourhood.py), with 1.2 km coarse neighbourhoods and 300 m fine patches at the two existing Curiosity science stops. Each field is relative to its own stop-centred datum and fades to the reference surface at its coarse boundary. Source elevations from different stops are never added or merged. The 2.34 m fine sample spacing is not improved source accuracy; small boulders, overhangs and wheel contact are not reconstructed. The existing colour imagery retains baked lighting. tools/gale_fields.py installs only validated, already-staged grids and preserves Jezero's default field.

The isolated Apollo canopy deployment review now carries five lower-ring openings and 68 continuous radial seam tapes through all authored morph poses. Ring count, 4% inter-ring openings and 24 mm tape width reuse illustrative choices from our existing canopy model; the new 8 mm drawing offset avoids coplanar surfaces. None of these is a measurement from TN D-7437. The final skirt band remains closed. No flown reefing ratios, inflation dynamics or mission timing are asserted.

IMERG precipitation imagery

NASA PPS/GPM's custom daily rain/snow-rate imagery, served by NASA GIBS (IMERG_Precipitation_Rate). Units mm/hr; this is not a rainfall accumulation, forecast or a specific scientific daily product. The 0.1-degree source is coarser than its 2 km display tile grid. Near-polar estimates can be missing; transparent pixels include no-data and rates below 0.1 mm/hr. NASA GIBS capabilities and its GPM_Precipitation_Rate colour map checked 25 October 2026. Sources: https://gpm.nasa.gov/data/imerg and https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nasa-gibs/worldview/main/config/default/common/config/metadata/layers/multi-mission/imerg/IMERG_Precipitation_Rate.md Open NASA Earth science data under the existing EOSDIS/GIBS terms. Rain and snow legends sample NASA's logarithmic colour map; the upper bin is ≥53.0884 mm/hr. Known daily gaps from the checked capabilities remain unavailable.

The Apollo LRV steering review (apollo_lrv_motion_review.py) uses original review geometry and ideal flat-ground four-wheel rolling. NASA's NSSDCA rover description supports opposite front/rear steering. Our 6 m chassis-centre turn radius and 2 m travel are illustrative inputs, not NASA's wall-to-wall turning limit or mission telemetry. Steering linkage, soil slip, suspension motion and failure states are not reconstructed. NASA's Apollo 15 rover account records initial front-steering trouble: this dual-steering review must not be applied indiscriminately to Apollo 15's first EVA. Four stepped review poses are deliberately not presented as a continuous historical manoeuvre.

The LRV review now also supports ideal single-axle steering. The turning centre moves to the fixed axle; all four wheels still roll, and the non-steering pair stays straight. These are mechanism demonstrations only, not recovered Apollo 15 commands, steering-link geometry or a timed failure/recovery sequence. The rear-only still sheet uses a 6 m lateral turning-centre offset; its chassis-centre circular radius is therefore larger than 6 m.

Atlantis parking review (25 October 2026)

The unpublished open-bay parking review reuses the Atlantis model and sources credited under “The ISS and Atlantis”. It returns the authored RMS joints to their existing rest pose and places the OBSS at the existing cradle coordinates. This endpoint is illustrative: no historical transfer motion, latch operation, clearance certification or launch readiness is claimed. Ku-band remains deployed and the doors remain open. No source geometry or flight asset changes.

Shuttle support-roll mechanism review

The unpublished atlantis_mpm_motion_review.py uses the 31-degree support rotation described in NASA-CR-193473, printed pages 11–12 (PDF pages 16–17), Figures 1–2: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19940012243/downloads/19940012243.pdf. The source drawing was inspected directly. Existing approximate pedestal geometry supplies a provisional pivot; isolated baseline/half/full/repeated poses illustrate the separate support motion, not verified stowage or mission timing. The original Atlantis source credits still apply.

Apollo linked deployment cluster review

apollo_cluster_deployment_review.py instances the existing single-canopy review three times, retaining its NASA TN D-7437 dimensions and documented illustrative profile/slot/line limitations. The cluster spread is shared with real_apollo_main_parachutes.py through cluster_spread; this is an authored clearance layout, not measured flight geometry. Inflation is simultaneous, with no mission-time, pilot/bag extraction or aerodynamic claim.

Apollo pilot-chute greybox

Original review geometry from NASA TN D-7437, Figure A-19 (printed A-13, PDF page 34), inspected directly: nominal diameter, 12 gores, suspension-line and combined/steel riser dimensions. Source: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19740003586/downloads/19740003586.pdf. The inflated diameter ratio, spherical profile, vent, eight rings, gaps, seam and cable thicknesses are authored proxies; the mesh does not claim the published constructed porosity. No source imagery or third-party mesh is redistributed. Bag, bridle, mortar and event timing are not yet modelled.

Half-hour IMERG precipitation imagery

The separate 30-minute layer uses NASA GIBS IMERG_Precipitation_Rate_30min, its published 30-minute time ranges and the same GPM precipitation-rate colour map. The 25 October 2026 capabilities advertise coverage from 1 January 1998, with half-hour gaps at 13 September 2025 20:00 UTC, 22 January 2026 00:30 UTC and 10 February 2026 00:30 UTC. Historical selections use their own half-hour; recent selections are capped at least four hours behind now and a missing slot is not silently replaced. NASA describes Early Run latency as about four hours; GIBS delivery may lag further. This is a half-hour mean rate (mm/hr), not accumulated rainfall, live weather or a forecast. The same NASA open-data terms and GIBS acknowledgement apply. https://gpm.nasa.gov/data/imerg https://gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov/wmts/epsg4326/best/1.0.0/WMTSCapabilities.xml

Apollo 7–10 and 12–17 launch-date milestones and short mission summaries use NASA's individual mission overview pages, accessed 25 October 2026: https://www.nasa.gov/mission/apollo-7/ through https://www.nasa.gov/mission/apollo-17/ . Added launch milestones use day precision, not an asserted midnight launch time. Apollo 11 retains its existing, separately sourced launch time. These events do not establish mission-specific flight paths, hardware variants or landing reconstructions.

SLIM lunar orbit, 10 January 2024

The orbit-only Explorer path uses JPL Horizons target -240 relative to the Moon, 10–11 January 2024 UTC, sampled every two minutes. Its time window is owned by slim_coverage.WINDOWS; the screened interval avoids Horizons' flagged defects and predicted descent. JAXA's 25 December orbit insertion release provides an independent approximate 600 × 4,000 km, 6.4-hour reference: https://www.jaxa.jp/press/2023/12/20231225-1_j.html . Trajectory: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons/ ; target restrictions: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/api/horizons.api?format=text&COMMAND=%27-240%27&MAKE_EPHEM=%27NO%27 . No JAXA model is redistributed, no greybox is promoted, and no measured attitude, landing reconstruction or manoeuvre timing is implied. Height is relative to the app's lunar reference surface, not local terrain.

Chandrayaan-3 orbit-only paths use JPL Horizons targets -158 (Vikram, 17 August 2023 14:00 UTC to 18 August 00:00) and -169 (propulsion module, 23–24 August 2023), relative to the Moon in ICRF. Samples are 60 and 120 seconds respectively. These bounded windows are shared with tools/chandrayaan3_coverage.py. ISRO’s mission chronology confirms separation on 17 August, followed by deboosting. The views do not reconstruct separation or touchdown, and show no unreviewed spacecraft model. The descent source becomes nearly stationary before the reported landing time and remains excluded. Orbit data: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons/.

NOAA aurora preparation: tools/aurora_forecast.py validates the latest OVATION feed at https://services.swpc.noaa.gov/json/ovation_aurora_latest.json. Product explanation: https://www.spaceweather.gov/products/aurora-30-minute-forecast (accessed 25 October 2026). NOAA describes a model forecast of auroral location and intensity; lead time depends on upstream solar-wind travel, and the Kp fallback may have no lead time. Feed Observation Time is not an issue time. The retained integer field is not a cloud forecast or guaranteed visibility. The browser layer uses the same source schema. It shows model values of 5 or more (lower values remain in the downloaded grid), with a green/yellow/red key. It is a forecast painted on the globe, not simulated auroral curtains or an observation. Historical dates and stale data are hidden. Globe and Map views use the same north-first grid, sampling at integer-coordinate pixel centres. Updates are requested at most every five minutes while Earth is shown in Live mode. Source grid: 65,160 bytes; RGBA texture: 260,640 bytes.

Apollo development milestones: NASA mission overviews for Apollo 1, Apollo 4, Apollo 5 and Apollo 6, checked 25 October 2026. Apollo 1 is a ground-test event with day precision, not a flight. Apollo 4 and 5 use the stated UT launch times. Apollo 6 uses minute precision because the overview gives both 01 and 01.5 seconds. Its shortened mission description is also checked against NASA’s “55 Years Ago: The Flight of Apollo 6” (https://www.nasa.gov/history/55-years-ago-the-flight-of-apollo-6/). These are original summaries and timeline milestones, not new trajectories.

Opportunity geological Director stops use original summaries of NASA/JPL’s Endurance rim report (6 May 2004), NASA’s Eagle–Victoria traverse caption and Endeavour arrival report. They reuse the credited PDS traverse and MER model; no source imagery is copied. Endurance uses the report date, not an asserted arrival time. Victoria uses 27 September 2006 from the traverse caption; the contemporary JPL release’s image caption instead says 26 September. These remain day-level navigation cues, not precise operations or detailed reconstructions of crater walls. Endeavour’s arrival date is 9 August 2011 (report published 10 August).

Victoria crater source-window review uses the HiRISE stereo DTM DTEEC_021747_1780_022380_1780_U01 and matched orthorectified RED image ESP_022380_1780_RED_C_01_ORTHO, from the HiRISE product page. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UArizona. HiRISE states its images are public domain (usage policy). tools/victoria_source.py reads a bounded 1.3 km window centred on the existing Opportunity Victoria science-stop position. Source scale is 1.0118528506825 m/pixel. DTM heights are relative to the Mars 2000 equipotential datum, not the viewer ellipsoid. Cropped imagery and DTM retain distinct affine origins; they must not be aligned by array index. Reserved/saturated imagery pixels remain masked. Review contrast is stretched independently; no terrain or imagery has yet been activated.

Opportunity registration audit (tools/opportunity_registration.py) compares our existing lander-tied conversion with the Transverse Mercator basemap CRS published in the Analyst’s Notebook map documentation. That page also documents separate HiRISE DEM/ortho rectification. The legacy CSV label does not specify its projection: the alternative conversion is a hypothesis for review, not an applied correction or confirmed source frame.

Tianwen-2 launch milestone: CNSA, mission update of 6 July 2026 (https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758823/n6758838/c10760422/content.html), which states launch from Xichang on 29 May 2025. Date only; no launch time or spacecraft ephemeris inferred. Blue Moon Mark 1 planned milestone: NASA launch schedule, updated 21 October 2026 (https://www.nasa.gov/event/clps-flight-blue-origins-blue-moon-mark-1/), checked 25 October 2026. Year-only 2027 plan, not a flown event or dated landing trajectory. These entries use original summaries; no source photographs or models are redistributed.

Opportunity registration source review: PDS Geosciences Analyst's Notebook, traverse resources, MERB_traverse_5130.zip. The archive's DBF provides geographic LON/LAT in a Mars 2000 sphere frame (radius 3,396,190 m), with six decimal places. All 21,104 records match the legacy CSV identity and raw/corrected position fields. Archive SHA-256: 6d099b39ccba6e46ee057e34d8d205215a0c09f393948e57ce21fa8860d9ee92. The label describes this derived traverse as not archived in PDS; it is provided by the PDS node from science-team corrections, not continuous measured telemetry. No terrain or active route change is made by this source audit.

Opportunity route update: the converter now uses the verified archive's LON/LAT fields directly rather than inferring a local XY frame. The route's starting position follows that same source; the independent historical lander catalogue is unchanged. Sol-to-UTC timing remains an interpolation at 14:00 LMST, not measured drive times. Raw HiRISE terrain is not activated by this correction.

Endurance terrain source review: PDS Geosciences Analyst's Notebook, traverse and crater terrain products, ASCII grid, accompanying header. Source hash 3350e148ba2209f46f64c3dd2a69203dbb2cb805eaa23a240ffd5a6a6c6183f3. 558 × 588 samples; centres span X 667.72–834.79 m and Y −219.43–−43.23 m. The header explicitly gives projection Unknown, datum NONE; these coordinates are not assumed to be the traverse XY frame. Source elevations are −8.4938 to 14.150756 m in an unspecified datum. Review only; no application activation, texture reuse or new imagery coverage claim. Verify original authorship/reuse terms and local-to-geographic registration before an application terrain asset.

Apollo 13 rescue milestones use NASA SP-4029's Apollo 13 timeline, GMT column at second precision: accident 14 April 1970 03:07:53, transearth injection ignition 15 April 02:40:39, splashdown 17 April 18:07:41. The mission report's rounded GET sequence agrees when added to its 11 April 19:13:00 range-zero epoch. Do not add the liftoff fractional-second offset again. Narrative context: NASA mission overview. These are timeline entries, not a spacecraft ephemeris, an Aquarius/Odyssey model variant or synchronized archive audio. Earth/Moon actions open context.

Spirit geological Director stops use published image dates, not precise science-operation times: Bonneville in Color (12 March 2004), Spirit atop Husband Hill (panorama 23 August 2005, article 1 September), and Spirit Hits a Home Run (Barnhill image 7 February 2006, publication 17 February). Original short summaries link to NASA/JPL sources; photographs are not copied. Existing interpolated traverse and MER model are reused. No detailed crater/hill terrain, new registration or reconstructed instrument operation is implied.

Hubble aperture-door operation reuses the existing credited model and its Hubble_ApertureDoor hinge from tools/assets/real_hubble.py. The builder's open pose is −75° about local X; the closed pose is −180°, so the operation adds a relative −105° rotation without moving the hinge. Five-second easing is an illustrative mechanism demonstration, not measured actuator timing or a scheduled Hubble event. No geometry, source imagery or model licence changed.

Juice pointing operations reuse the credited model's Juice_MGA_APM and Juice_SolarArray_PY / Juice_SolarArray_MY pivots from tools/assets/real_juice.py. Local Z antenna rotation (±20°) and local Y wing rotation (±15°) are conservative illustrative demonstration ranges, not verified flight limits. Five-second transitions are illustrative timing; this is neither deployment reconstruction nor flight telemetry. The fixed high-gain antenna and deployed instrument booms are unchanged. No new mesh, source image or licence is introduced.

Curiosity ridge Director stops use NASA's Vera Rubin Ridge panorama caption (image acquisition 22 June 2017, not its September publication date) and Gediz Vallis route caption (study-area arrival 14 August 2023). Original summaries link to these sources; no panorama is downloaded. Day-level navigation reuses the recorded traverse, existing rover and terrain fallback. Detailed ridge outcrops, panorama camera orientations and instrument operations are not reconstructed.

MRO solar-wing operations reuse the credited NASA model and existing MRO_SolarArray_PX / MRO_SolarArray_MX pivot origins in tools/assets/real_mro.py. NASA's 2005 launch press kit, page 34 describes the gimbaled solar arrays. Our local-X ±25° rotation and five-second easing are illustrative, not operational limits, flight telemetry, deployment or a full two-axis Sun-tracking solution. The antenna and radar remain fixed. No new geometry or source imagery is added.

Europa Clipper wing operation reuses the existing NASA model and its local-X Clipper_SolarArray_PX / _MX pivots, including wing-mounted REASON antennas. The NASA spacecraft press kit describes the wings and radar arrangement; the mission design paper describes array tracking and holding during observations. Our ±15° motion and five-second easing are illustrative, not flight limits, deployment, telemetry or a Sun-tracking solution. HGA and magnetometer boom stay fixed. No new mesh or source imagery is added.

Juno/Galileo arrival Director cues reuse the existing trajectory and paired orbit-insertion markers in tools/flybys.py; no event time is introduced or copied. Juno retains the distinction between the path's event times and the Earth-reception times written in its markers. The camera sequence is authored, not measured spacecraft attitude or engine telemetry. Arrivals with a missing, reversed or out-of-range endpoint do not receive a burn-window sequence.

MESSENGER arrival guidance uses rounded spacecraft-event times from APL's post-insertion announcement: main-thruster firing at 20:45 EDT on 17 March 2011 for approximately 15 minutes, represented as about 00:45–01:00 UTC on 18 March. Both markers and the burn caption say approximate. The 21:10 EDT reception of shutdown confirmation is 01:10 UTC on Earth, not the spacecraft shutdown time. This rounded window is not the planned 00:45:00–00:59:43 interval in the pre-insertion press-kit figure, nor a claim to reproduce the final attitude-stabilisation tweak. Existing Horizons positions are unchanged; only camera guidance and event notes change.

Calculated spacecraft communications pointing (0.0.9 correction)

Explorer uses geometric Earth and Sun directions at the displayed date, from its existing ephemerides. These are nominal communications poses, not recorded attitude kernels, contact schedules, light-time/aberration-corrected antenna solutions, or reconstructions of science and thrust manoeuvres. Roll is illustrative. Unsupported missions retain their existing orientation rules; authored landing, drive, staged and thrust attitudes take precedence.

No model geometry or textures were replaced; their existing source/licence credits continue to apply. Pointing rules and glTF axes live in the shared viewer/spacecraft_pointing.js, used by both path and Solar System views.

Pioneer and Ulysses calculated communications poses (0.0.10)

Pioneer 10/11's nominal Earth-pointing dish follows NASA SP-446, Pioneer: First to Jupiter, Saturn, and Beyond, attitude-control description. Ulysses follows the archived mission description, The Ulysses Mission, section 5.1. These are calculated geometries using the existing ephemerides and credited models, not recorded attitudes. The model scripts define dish boresight as Blender +Z, exported as glTF +Y. Spin phase, pointing drift, manoeuvres and post-contact attitude are not reconstructed. No new model or imagery is used.

Cassini's Explorer final-approach path now also uses the existing NASA/JPL reconstructed attitude kernel 17257_17262ra.bc, with cas_v43.tf and cas00172.tsc. Quaternion samples map the credited spacecraft model into J2000; the viewer then applies the body's rotation. Covered intervals are interpolated separately. The 66-second coverage gap and the brief interval after the kernel ends hold the last inertial pose and are labelled as gaps. The film's existing attitude reconstruction is unchanged.

Juno's 30 December 2023 Io flyby uses NASA/JPL NAIF's reconstructed juno_sc_rec_231229_231230_v02.bc, JNO_SCLKSCET.00212.tsc and juno_v12.tf. Five-second quaternion samples preserve the recorded spin and pointing in the existing six-hour path. These are sampled flight attitudes, not commanded Earth-pointing; no new imagery or geometry is introduced. The inputs can be fetched explicitly with python tools/attitudes.py --fetch; builds do not fetch.

OSIRIS-REx's Bennu TAG path uses NASA/JPL's reconstructed orx_sc_red_201020_v02.bc, ORX_SCLKSCET.00118.tsc and the existing orx_v14.tf. The CK header identifies reconstructed ACS data as its input. The body attitude is sampled every five seconds, retaining the path's one-second samples during contact and back-away. Model articulation remains the existing illustrative operation; the recorded data controls the spacecraft body, not the arm joints.

Explorer's Coprates replay reuses our existing fictional Mars-descent shot 5: tools/shots.py, its authored GLB anchor animation and shots/05_mars.json camera frames. It is the film's lander/camera path, not a historical mission or measured trajectory. The existing illustrative canyon is retained. Film exhaust, dust and child-part animation are not reproduced by this transform-only player.

Shackleton's Explorer replay uses our existing shot 4 camera samples and fixed base transform. Its 70 m rim move and pan follow the authored film camera; the fictional base and previously credited NASA LOLA terrain are reused. Crew, moving subparts and the film's practical-light effects are not replayed.

Philae's Explorer film replay reuses shot 11's existing GLB anchor animation and camera samples from shots/11_philae.json, with the local comet frame from shots/11_philae_path.json. The existing Philae trajectory, model and 67P source credits above apply unchanged. This is the film reconstruction, including its accelerated post-touchdown time and illustrative attitude/contact motion, not a new measured attitude product. Dust, added boulders and leg flex are not replayed. No new external asset or licence is introduced.

Voyager's Explorer film replay reuses shot 3's existing 03.glb model transform and all 720 camera samples in shots/03_voyager.json. The model and Horizons position retain their existing credits. This film shot holds the craft at its encounter position while the camera arcs and moves towards the dish; it is not a new continuous encounter trajectory or recorded attitude product. Flight samples subtract the shot body's centre displacement before conversion into the fixed Explorer body frame. No external asset or licence was added.

Cassini's Explorer film replay reuses the existing shot 12 GLB anchor and 768 camera samples from shots/12_cassini.json. Its trajectory and NASA reconstructed attitude retain the film's existing source credits; no new trajectory or attitude was invented. The authored 600×-to-real-time pacing is retained. Explorer holds the shot's reference date for the surrounding scene; atmospheric effects and loss-of-signal graphics are not replayed. Reference rotation axes retain extra precision for the long relative plunge.

New Horizons Jupiter encounter attitude (0.0.10 isolated candidate)

NASA PDS NH-J/P/SS-SPICE-6-V1.0 (DOI 10.17189/1520109), reconstructed engineering-telemetry attitude: NAIF archive, ck/merged_nhpc_2007_v006.bc, sclk/new_horizons_3381.tsc, fk/nh_v220.tf. Prepared NASA New Horizons model already uses that spacecraft frame; glTF -Z (dish boresight) maps to spacecraft +Y. Candidate displays only three hours either side of Jupiter closest approach, with five-second seed samples and adaptive refinement; outside this sampled window it explicitly holds the nearest boundary pose. This is a display budget restriction, not a gap in the source CK. No historical communications mode or Earth-pointing assumption is substituted. Source files remain local build inputs; the viewer receives sampled quaternions.

New Horizons Arrokoth encounter attitude

The same NASA PDS New Horizons SPICE archive supplies merged_nhpc_2019_v029.bc, labelled ACTUAL, KEM1, spacecraft frame -98000. Uses the pinned new_horizons_3381.tsc clock and nh_v220.tf frame. Full coverage of the existing four-hour Arrokoth path, 1 January 2019 03:33:22–07:33:22 UTC; five-second seed sampling with adaptive refinement. No communications-pointing assumption or trajectory change. The CK is 22,542,336 bytes, SHA-256 57604592021b1e7f24e3be516bedd6f7cc93c3a9726f95326011a50bf39e7363.

New Horizons Pluto encounter attitude

NASA PDS NH-J/P/SS-SPICE-6-V1.0 merged_nhpc_2015_v039.bc, labelled ACTUAL / PLUTO ENCOUNTER, spacecraft frame -98000, with pinned new_horizons_3381.tsc and nh_v220.tf. Only the four hours centred on the existing Pluto closest-approach epoch are sampled (14 July 2015, 09:48:29–13:48:29 UTC); outside, the boundary pose is explicitly held rather than presented as measured pointing. Five-second seed sampling with adaptive refinement, no trajectory or model changes. CK size 105,793,536 bytes, SHA-256 91c4a08ce75ed12510731c51b4a9410f6c1f30462bad09aad428b498c951627c.

The separate Charon encounter path uses this same reconstructed 2015 CK and spacecraft frame, sampled independently about its existing closest approach: 14 July 2015, 10:02:22–14:02:22 UTC. Its 4,081 samples fit the unchanged 5,000 limit. Outside this interval the boundary pose is explicitly held. No trajectory or model changes. Independent source probing measured .011050 degrees maximum interpolation error across 26,641 probes; this is not a continuous error bound or a statement of telemetry accuracy.

Dawn Ceres recorded attitude

The six-hour interval around the existing 6 March 2015 capture marker uses NASA/JPL NAIF Dawn reconstructed spacecraft CK, DAWN_203_SCLKSCET.00091.tsc and dawn_v16.tf from the same archive. Pinned input hashes and sizes are in tools/attitudes.py. Operational telemetry quaternions are sampled at five-second seeds with adaptive refinement; the 4,321 samples fit the existing 5,000-sample budget. Outside the interval the boundary pose is held and labelled. The NASA model retains nominal dish alignment (about .0243 degrees from the FK boresight); arrays and ion engines are static. No thrust activity, measured gimbal motion or absolute pointing accuracy is implied. The model-frame audit is in reports/dawn-dish-frame-audit.json.

Juice measured attitude during the 2024 lunar–Earth flyby

ESA SPICE Service's measured spacecraft CK, juice_step_241112_v01.tsc and juice_v46.tf supply housekeeping telemetry orientation. The sampler explicitly uses JUICE_SPACECRAFT_MEAS, avoiding the planned-data fallback of the spacecraft switch frame. Separate four-hour intervals use 721 samples each (20-second seeds, adaptive refinement available). Independent 7,200-point comparisons per interval give maximum source differences of .000501 and .001232 degrees; these are not absolute attitude accuracy. Outside coverage the boundary pose is held and labelled. Our model's solar arrays and medium-gain antenna remain static and nominally aligned; their measured joint motion is not reproduced. No ESA reference CAD mesh is shipped.

Europa Clipper's Mars encounter body attitude uses NASA/JPL's reconstructed EHA quaternion kernel, clock europaclipper_00023.tsc and frame kernel v16. The source comments describe engineering-telemetry time tags typically delayed by 0.25 seconds, sometimes up to 0.5 seconds. Numerical interpolation agreement does not remove that timing uncertainty. The existing NASA VTAD mesh uses a nominal identity glTF-to-spacecraft body mapping, verified against signed body landmarks; this is not optical/RF boresight calibration. Arrays remain in the model's static pose, not the available recorded array-joint motion. Pinned input hashes and source/geometry audits are retained in reports/clipper-*.

Lucy encounter body attitudes use NASA/PDS's released weekly operational SPICE products: lcy_sc_rel_231030_231106_v02.bc, lcy_sc_rel_250414_250421_v02.bc, lucy_v13.tf and lucy_sclkscet_00038.tsc. Source comments explicitly allow interpolation across intervals up to 301 seconds. Agreement with these products is not continuous measured telemetry or absolute pointing accuracy. The existing project model uses its nominal body/dish alignment; its instrument pointing platform and solar arrays remain static. No recorded joint motion is claimed. Input hashes, nominal model landmarks and independent source comparisons are recorded in reports/lucy-attitude-coverage.json.

Historical Atlantic cyclone positions use NOAA National Hurricane Center HURDAT2, the pinned 1851–2025 release dated 23 September 2026. These are revisable post-storm analyses, not live observations or forecasts. The layer shows source positions from the preceding 72 hours without interpolated centres or warning areas. Non-synoptic event times and missing wind/pressure/radius values are preserved. The region excludes other ocean basins; missing prepared records do not establish absence of storms. See reports/cyclone-atlantic-source-audit.json for source hash and NHC format reference. US Government data; NOAA attribution, no endorsement.

Dated two-day flood classifications (candidate)

NASA LANCE MODIS Aqua+Terra MCDWD_L3_NRT, doi:10.5067/MODIS/MCDWD_L3_NRT.061, and VIIRS JPSS1+JPSS2 VCDWD_L3_NRT, doi:10.5067/VIIRS/VCDWD_L3_NRT.002, via NASA GIBS/ESDIS. Product overview. The candidate uses MODIS through 23 June 2025 and VIIRS from 24 June 2025, within the pinned advertised service intervals only. It shows the selected day and preceding day as a composite, not the selected hour or water depth. Clouds, shadows and reference-water errors limit interpretation. Transparent pixels do not establish no flooding. Recurring-flood code2 was unpopulated in RevE; its presence in the legend does not establish later implementation. No endorsement, warning or forecast claim. Source hashes and regional review are recorded in reports/flood-source-audit.json and reports/flood-regional-review.json.

Daily SO₂ column imagery

Optional dated Suomi NPP OMPS upper-troposphere/stratosphere imagery uses NASA GIBS NMSO2-PCA-L2-NRT; product DOI, NASA archive. NASA/NOAA imagery provided by NASA GIBS / ESDIS under the EOSDIS open data policy; no endorsement. The 17 km centre of mass is a retrieval assumption, not measured plume altitude. Daily column in DU, not ash or ground concentration or a warning. 25 km sensor resolution differs from the 2 km display grid. Transparent means missing data; coverage gaps and the pinned end date are retained. NOAA-20 is not substituted.

BepiColombo's bounded planned Mercury capture path (20–22 November 2026) uses NASA/JPL Horizons geometric vectors from Mercury, ICRF, provided by ESA's bc_mpo_fcp_00236_20181020_20270411_v01 trajectory. The source is predicted after 28 September 2026, not recorded capture telemetry. Planning status follows ESA arrival updates. Frame conversion uses the existing Mercury pole/prime-meridian model; MTM is omitted without simulated separation motion. This window does not bridge the existing cruise endpoint. Source hashes and numerical limits are recorded in reports/bepicolombo-capture-schema-review.json.

Illustrative Mars and Titan ground skies (Explorer)

Texture-free gradients use the selected date's existing Sun direction. Qualitative references: Curiosity sunset, PIA19401 (NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Texas A&M Univ.) and Huygens surface, PIA07232 (NASA/JPL/ESA/University of Arizona). Images remain reference-only; no image pixels are shipped or fitted. Mars's localized blue dusk and Titan's diffuse warm haze are illustrative, not measured weather, radiance or calibrated RGB. Smooth fades by 60 km (Mars) and 200 km (Titan) are visual limits, not atmospheric boundaries. Earth's shader is unchanged; Map, Full light and airless bodies do not use these skies.

Home discovery feature previews (2026-10-28)